Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Research partners: two teams, one study population.

Carol G Kelley1, Amy R Lipson, Barbara J Daly

  • 1Frances Payne Bolton School of Nursing, Case Western Reserve University, 10900 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio 44106-4904, USA. cxg11@cwru.edu

Nursing Research
|July 22, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Whose Autonomy Matters? Using Relational Autonomy to Analyze Caregiver Roles in Decision-Making for Cancer Clinical Trials.

AJOB empirical bioethics·2025
Same author

Scoping review of family caregiver roles in cancer clinical trial decision-making.

Clinical trials (London, England)·2025
Same author

Unmet Social Needs Among Cancer Survivors Who Were Concomitant Caregivers: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the Health Information National Trends Survey.

JCO oncology practice·2025
Same author

Stakeholder perspectives on the role of caregivers in cancer clinical trial decision-making: results of a qualitative study.

Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer·2025
Same author

Understanding the Utility of Less Than Six-Month Prognosis Using Administrative Data Among U.S. Nursing Home Residents With Cancer.

Palliative medicine reports·2024
Same author

Factors influencing how informal caregivers of people with multiple sclerosis access and use a curated intervention website: Analysis from an RCT.

Digital health·2024
Same journal

ENRS President's Message.

Nursing research·2026
Same journal

ENRS President's Message.

Nursing research·2026
Same journal

Theory in Science.

Nursing research·2026
Same journal

Using National Databases to Analyze Nurse Suicide Mortality.

Nursing research·2026
Same journal

Scoping Review of Barriers and Facilitators of Cervical Cancer Screening in Appalachia.

Nursing research·2026
Same journal

Study Protocol to Characterize Symptom Experience During Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy for Cutaneous Melanoma.

Nursing research·2026
See all related articles

Two National Institutes of Health studies, Disease Management and Thrive, are examining chronically critically ill patients. Collaboration streamlines operations, with results pending future publications.

Area of Science:

  • Critical care medicine
  • Longitudinal studies
  • Health services research

Background:

  • Two NIH-funded projects, Disease Management and Thrive, focus on chronically critically ill populations.
  • Each study maintains separate management, databases, and budgets.
  • Operational tasks are streamlined through cross-training and collaboration.

Purpose of the Study:

  • The Disease Management project tests a care program's effectiveness for improving outcomes in chronically critically ill patients and caregivers post-discharge.
  • The Thrive study investigates weaning patterns and illness-related variables in chronically critically ill patients.
  • Combined efforts aim to glean comprehensive insights from longitudinal data.

Main Methods:

  • Disease Management: Randomized clinical trial.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Thrive study: Prospective longitudinal investigation.
  • Participant enrollment: 400 participants in each study to date.

    • Main Results:

    • Participant enrollment is robust, with 400 individuals in each study.
    • Data analysis is ongoing.
    • Study findings will be disseminated through future publications.

    Conclusions:

    • Collaboration allows for rich data set examination and longitudinal data gathering.
    • Synergistic research efforts enhance understanding of the chronically critically ill.
    • Potential limitations of this collaborative approach are acknowledged.