A clinical and pharmacological study of arsenic trioxide in advanced multiple myeloma patients

P Rousselot1, J Larghero, B Arnulf

  • 1Department of Immunology, Hematology, Cell Therapy and Institute of Hematology, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France.

Leukemia
|July 23, 2004
PubMed

Insights

Arsenic trioxide (ATO) showed limited efficacy in advanced multiple myeloma (MM) patients, with no complete or partial remissions observed. Further research is needed to improve drug delivery and explore combination therapies for better outcomes in MM treatment.

Area of Science:

  • Hematology
  • Oncology
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • Arsenic trioxide (ATO) and melarsoprol have demonstrated potential in inhibiting multiple myeloma (MM) cell growth in preclinical studies.
  • This study investigates the clinical efficacy and toxicity of arsenic derivatives in patients with relapsed or refractory MM.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the safety and efficacy of arsenic trioxide (ATO) and melarsoprol in patients with relapsing or refractory secretory multiple myeloma (MM).
  • To assess treatment response, toxicity profiles, and serum arsenic concentrations in MM patients receiving arsenic derivatives.

Main Methods:

  • A clinical trial involving 12 patients with relapsing or refractory secretory MM.
  • Ten patients received arsenic trioxide (ATO) (continuous or discontinuous schedule), and two received melarsoprol.
  • Treatment response, adverse events, and serum arsenic levels were monitored.

Main Results:

  • The melarsoprol arm was stopped early due to toxicity.
  • Arsenic trioxide (ATO) treatment resulted in significant hepatic toxicity (grade 3 in one, grade 2 in eight patients) and other adverse events including neuropathy, encephalitis, and leuconeutropenia.
  • No complete or partial remissions were observed; however, three patients showed a minor response and four had stable M-protein levels.
  • Responses were transient after ATO discontinuation.

Conclusions:

  • Arsenic trioxide (ATO) as a single agent did not yield significant responses in advanced MM patients, despite adequate arsenic exposure.
  • The observed toxicities, particularly hepatic, limit its use.
  • Improved strategies for drug delivery, pharmacokinetics, and combination therapies are necessary to enhance the efficacy of arsenic derivatives in MM treatment.