Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 23, 2026

Cytotoxic Efficacy of Photodynamic Therapy in Osteosarcoma Cells In Vitro
Published on: March 18, 2014
A clinical and pharmacological study of arsenic trioxide in advanced multiple myeloma patients
P Rousselot1, J Larghero, B Arnulf
1Department of Immunology, Hematology, Cell Therapy and Institute of Hematology, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France.
Abstract:
We previously showed that arsenic trioxide (ATO) and melarsoprol may inhibit the growth of multiple myeloma (MM) cells in vitro and in vivo. We report here the administration of arsenic derivatives in 12 relapsing or refractory secretory MM patients. A total of 10 patients received ATO (eight in a continuous schedule, two discontinuously) and two received melarsoprol. The melarsoprol arm was prematurely closed due to toxicity. In the ATO arm, median duration of treatment was 38 days (9-54). Hepatic toxicity was grade 3 and 2 in one and eight patients, respectively. Other toxicities included neuropathy (n=2, grade 2), encephalitis (n=1, grade 3) and leuconeutropenia (n=4, grade 3). At 2 weeks after treatment initiation, mean serum concentration of arsenic was 1.11+/-0.16 micromol/l. No complete or partial remission was observed. A minor response (25-49% reduction of M protein in serum) and a stabilization of the M-protein level were observed in three and four patients, respectively. After ATO discontinuation, these responses were of short duration in all cases. ATO as a single agent did not produce any significant response in advanced MM patients despite sufficient arsenic exposure. Strategies to improve biodistribution, pharmacokinetic and efficacy of the drug as well as treatment combinations are needed.
Insights
Arsenic trioxide (ATO) showed limited efficacy in advanced multiple myeloma (MM) patients, with no complete or partial remissions observed. Further research is needed to improve drug delivery and explore combination therapies for better outcomes in MM treatment.
Area of Science:
- Hematology
- Oncology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Arsenic trioxide (ATO) and melarsoprol have demonstrated potential in inhibiting multiple myeloma (MM) cell growth in preclinical studies.
- This study investigates the clinical efficacy and toxicity of arsenic derivatives in patients with relapsed or refractory MM.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the safety and efficacy of arsenic trioxide (ATO) and melarsoprol in patients with relapsing or refractory secretory multiple myeloma (MM).
- To assess treatment response, toxicity profiles, and serum arsenic concentrations in MM patients receiving arsenic derivatives.
Main Methods:
- A clinical trial involving 12 patients with relapsing or refractory secretory MM.
- Ten patients received arsenic trioxide (ATO) (continuous or discontinuous schedule), and two received melarsoprol.
- Treatment response, adverse events, and serum arsenic levels were monitored.
Main Results:
- The melarsoprol arm was stopped early due to toxicity.
- Arsenic trioxide (ATO) treatment resulted in significant hepatic toxicity (grade 3 in one, grade 2 in eight patients) and other adverse events including neuropathy, encephalitis, and leuconeutropenia.
- No complete or partial remissions were observed; however, three patients showed a minor response and four had stable M-protein levels.
- Responses were transient after ATO discontinuation.
Conclusions:
- Arsenic trioxide (ATO) as a single agent did not yield significant responses in advanced MM patients, despite adequate arsenic exposure.
- The observed toxicities, particularly hepatic, limit its use.
- Improved strategies for drug delivery, pharmacokinetics, and combination therapies are necessary to enhance the efficacy of arsenic derivatives in MM treatment.
Related Concept Videos
Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...