Clinical trial insurance in a comparative law perspective
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 23, 2026

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
1Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Health Law, Maastricht University, The Netherlands.
Abstract:
This paper presents the results of a comparative legal study on liability and insurance of clinical trials, including Belgium, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Spain, Switzerland, Sweden and the United Kingdom. In most countries the right to compensation of the trial subject is safeguarded, but the existing regimes show much variety. Seen from the perspective of the trial subject there is no justification for linking the extent of compensation to the object of the trial (involving drugs or not), to the nature of the trial (therapeutic or non-therapeutic) or to the status of the researcher (public entity or not).
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Blinding
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial evaluating a...
Preclinical Development: Overview
