Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Testing for microevolution in body size in three blue tit populations.

A Charmantier1, L E B Kruuk, J Blondel

  • 1Centre d'Ecologie Fonctionnelle Evolutive, CNRS, Montpellier Cedex, France. anne.charmantier@zoology.oxford.ac.uk

Journal of Evolutionary Biology
|July 24, 2004
PubMed
Summary

Blue tits show genetic variation in body size traits across different habitats. Despite evidence of selection, no microevolutionary response was observed, possibly due to gene flow.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Continental Patterns of Phenotypic Variation Along Replicated Urban Gradients: A Mega-Analysis.

Ecology letters·2025
Same author

Infective anoproctitis in men having sex with men: Don't forget Mycoplasma genitalium.

Infectious diseases now·2023
Same author

Phenotypic variation in urban environments: mechanisms and implications.

Trends in ecology & evolution·2021
Same author

The 'algebra of evolution': the Robertson-Price identity and viability selection for body mass in a wild bird population.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2020
Same author

Heritability estimates from genomewide relatedness matrices in wild populations: Application to a passerine, using a small sample size.

Molecular ecology resources·2018
Same author

Conserved G-matrices of morphological and life-history traits among continental and island blue tit populations.

Heredity·2017

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary biology
  • Quantitative genetics
  • Ecology

Background:

  • Understanding microevolution requires quantifying genetic variation and selection on phenotypes.
  • Long-term studies comparing conspecific populations in different environments are crucial but scarce.
  • Population differentiation in natural settings remains understudied.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze additive genetic variation and selection on body-size traits in blue tit populations.
  • To investigate how habitat quality influences heritability and selection pressures.
  • To assess the microevolutionary response to selection in distinct natural environments.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of additive genetic variation for two body-size traits (tarsus length, body mass) in three blue tit populations.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Estimation of heritabilities and selection gradients across populations in different habitats.
  • Monitoring for microevolutionary responses to selection over the study period.

    • Main Results:

    • Substantial genetic variation for both tarsus length and body mass was found in all populations.
    • Heritability of body mass increased with habitat quality.
    • Weak positive selection on tarsus length and strong positive selection on body mass were observed in poorer habitats, but not in the good habitat.
    • No significant microevolutionary response to selection was detected in any population.

    Conclusions:

    • Blue tit populations exhibit genetic variation and varying selection pressures related to habitat quality.
    • The absence of a detectable microevolutionary response suggests complex factors, potentially including gene flow and spatial heterogeneity, are at play.
    • Further research is needed to fully elucidate the mechanisms driving population differentiation and adaptation in response to environmental differences.