Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Lying words: predicting deception from linguistic styles.

Matthew L Newman1, James W Pennebaker, Diane S Berry

  • 1Department of Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin, TX 78712, USA.

Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin
|July 27, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Predictors of Incident Dementia in a Cohort of Elders with Essential Tremor: A Prospective, Longitudinal Study.

Neuro-degenerative diseases·2026
Same author

Feeling Like a Woman: Interoception and the Objectified Body.

Brain sciences·2026
Same author

Intention Tremor Severity Trajectory: Results from a Prospective Longitudinal Study of Essential Tremor.

Tremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same author

Effects of surgical therapies on cognitive function in patients with essential tremor.

Journal of the neurological sciences·2025
Same author

Blood-based Alzheimer's disease biomarkers and cognitive decline in essential tremor.

Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD·2025
Same author

Validity of Self-Report Information on Cranial Tremors in Essential Tremor: Analysis of Data from a Large, Prospective Cohort.

Neuroepidemiology·2025

Researchers analyzed linguistic styles to differentiate truth from deception. Liars exhibited lower cognitive complexity and different word choices compared to truth-tellers, enabling classification with moderate accuracy.

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Linguistics
  • Computational Social Science

Background:

  • Deception detection is a critical area of research.
  • Linguistic analysis offers potential insights into distinguishing truthful from deceptive communication.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate linguistic style features that differentiate true and false stories.
  • To assess the accuracy of computer-based text analysis in classifying liars and truth-tellers.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of five independent samples of true and false stories.
  • Utilized a computer-based text analysis program to evaluate linguistic features.
  • Examined variables such as cognitive complexity, self-references, other-references, and negative emotion words.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • A computer-based text analysis program achieved 67% accuracy in classifying liars and truth-tellers with a constant topic, and 61% overall.
  • Liars demonstrated lower cognitive complexity compared to truth-tellers.
  • Liars used fewer self-references and other-references, and more negative emotion words.

Conclusions:

  • Linguistic style features can distinguish between true and false narratives.
  • Computer-based analysis shows potential for identifying deception based on textual cues.
  • Further research can refine these methods for improved accuracy in lie detection.