Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 23, 2026

Dynamic Assessments of Coronary Flow Reserve after Myocardial Ischemia Reperfusion in Mice
Published on: August 25, 2023
Blood flow in coronary artery bypass vein grafts: volume versus velocity at cardiovascular MR imaging
Liesbeth P Salm1, Susan E Langerak, Hubert W Vliegen
1Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands. l.p.salm@lumc.nl
Insights
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (MR) imaging effectively assesses bypass grafts after surgery. Velocity analysis offers similar diagnostic accuracy to volume flow analysis but is quicker, making it the preferred method for detecting significant stenoses.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular imaging
- Medical diagnostics
- Biomedical engineering
Background:
- Bypass surgery is a common procedure for coronary artery disease.
- Monitoring the patency of bypass grafts is crucial for patient outcomes.
- Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (MR) imaging offers a non-invasive method for graft assessment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the diagnostic accuracy of volume flow and velocity analyses using cardiovascular MR imaging for evaluating single-vein bypass grafts.
- To determine the preferred MR imaging analysis method for detecting significant graft stenoses.
Main Methods:
- Forty-nine patients with prior bypass surgery were included.
- Coronary angiography and cardiovascular MR imaging of single-vein bypass grafts were performed.
- Volume flow and velocity analyses were conducted and compared using Bland-Altman analysis and receiver operating characteristic curves.
Main Results:
- Bland-Altman analysis indicated close agreement between volume flow and velocity analyses.
- No significant differences were found in detecting stenoses of 70% or greater between the two methods.
- Diagnostic accuracy for volume flow and velocity parameters was high (92% and 93%, respectively).
Conclusions:
- Cardiovascular MR imaging is accurate for assessing bypass grafts.
- Velocity analysis is a time-efficient alternative to volume flow analysis with comparable diagnostic accuracy.
- Velocity analysis is recommended as the preferred method for evaluating bypass graft stenosis.
Abstract:
Forty-nine patients with previous bypass surgery underwent coronary angiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of single-vein bypass grafts. Volume flow and velocity analyses were performed and compared on MR velocity maps. Bland-Altman analysis showed close agreement between the two types of analysis. Comparison of areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve revealed no significant differences between the analyses for detection of stenoses of 70% or greater. Diagnostic accuracy for volume flow and velocity parameters was 92% and 93%, respectively. Velocity analysis appears to be the preferred method, because it is less time-consuming and has a similar diagnostic accuracy to volume flow analysis.
Related Concept Videos
Blood Flow
Imaging Studies VII: Vascular Imaging
Coronary Circulation
Coronary circulation begins at the base of the aorta, where two main arteries arise—the left and right coronary arteries. These arteries encircle the heart in the coronary sulcus and supply the...
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
