Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 23, 2026

Physical Activity Measurement in Children Accepting Table Tennis Training
Published on: July 27, 2022
Prediction equations for resting energy expenditure in overweight and normal-weight black and white children
Jennifer R McDuffie1, Diane C Adler-Wailes, Jane Elberg
1Unit on Growth and Obesity, Developmental Endocrinology Branch, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. mcduffj@unc.edu
Insights
Accurate resting energy expenditure (REE) prediction in children requires sex-specific equations that include race. New equations incorporating race improve REE estimation for diverse pediatric populations.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Nutrition
- Metabolic Research
- Biostatistics
Background:
- Accurate estimation of children's resting energy expenditure (REE) is crucial for effective dietary therapy planning.
- Existing REE prediction equations may not adequately represent diverse pediatric populations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the accuracy and utility of five established REE prediction equations in a diverse group of young children.
- To develop and validate new REE prediction equations that account for sex and race.
Main Methods:
- Resting energy expenditure (REE) was measured in 502 Black and White children (aged 6-11 years) using indirect calorimetry across four US sites.
- Measured REE values were compared against predictions from five existing equations.
- New sex-specific and race-inclusive equations were derived using either easily measured variables (weight, height) or body composition data (fat-free mass, fat mass).
Main Results:
- None of the existing equations provided consistently accurate and unbiased REE estimates for the study population.
- Newly developed sex-specific equations incorporating race explained a significant portion of REE variance (69-75%).
- Equations utilizing easily measured variables (weight, height) and body composition variables demonstrated improved REE prediction accuracy when race was included.
Conclusions:
- Current REE prediction equations are insufficient for diverse pediatric groups.
- Sex-specific REE prediction equations must incorporate race to achieve adequate accuracy in children.
- The developed race-inclusive equations offer improved REE estimation for pediatric dietary management.
Background:
Accurate estimation of children's resting energy expenditure (REE) is important for planning dietary therapy.
Objective:
Our objective was to compare the utility of 5 REE prediction equations in a diverse sample of young children.
Design:
REE was obtained in 502 black and white girls and boys aged 6-11 y by using indirect calorimetry at 4 US sites. Measured REE and REE predicted from the equations were compared.
Results:
None of the equations provided both accurate and unbiased estimates of REE. Two new sets of sex-specific equations including race as a factor were generated and evaluated. One set used easily measured variables-females: REE = 0.046 x weight - 4.492 x 1/height(2) - 0.151 x race + 5.841; males: REE = 0.037 x weight - 4.67 x 1/height(2) - 0.159 x race + 6.792-and accounted for 72% and 69%, respectively, of REE variance. The other set used body-composition variables-females: REE = 0.101 x fat-free mass + 0.025 x fat mass + 0.293 x height(3) - 0.185 x race + 1.643; males: REE = 0.078 x fat-free mass + 0.026 x fat mass - 2.646 x 1/height(2) - 0.244 x race + 4.8-and accounted for 75% and 71%, respectively, of REE variance. When split by race and adiposity, the small bias generated could be corrected to within 0.25 MJ (60 kcal) of the mean measured value.
Conclusion:
Sex-specific equations must take race into account to predict REE adequately in children.
Related Concept Videos
Metabolic Rate
The Basal Metabolic Rate (BMR) measures the energy expended at rest.
Several factors influence the...
Rigid Body Equilibrium Problems - II
Consider two children sitting on a seesaw, which has negligible mass. The first child has a mass (m1) of 26 kg and sits at point A, which is 1.6 meters (r1) from the pivot point B; the second child has a mass (m2) of 32 kg and sits at point C. How far from the pivot point B should the second child sit (r2) to balance the seesaw?

