Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Quantitative genetic models for describing simultaneous and recursive relationships between phenotypes.

Daniel Gianola1, Daniel Sorensen

  • 1Departments of Animal Sciences, Dairy Science and Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA. gianola@calshp.cals.wisc.edu

Genetics
|July 29, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparison of approximation methods for genomic estimated breeding values from observed to liability scales in dairy cattle health traits.

Journal of dairy science·2025
Same author

Genomic prediction of blood biomarkers of metabolic disorders in Holstein cattle using parametric and nonparametric models.

Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE·2024
Same author

(Quasi) multitask support vector regression with heuristic hyperparameter optimization for whole-genome prediction of complex traits: a case study with carcass traits in broilers.

G3 (Bethesda, Md.)·2023
Same author

Inference about quantitative traits under selection: a Bayesian revisitation for the post-genomic era.

Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE·2022
Same author

Genome-Enabled Prediction Methods Based on Machine Learning.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2022
Same author

Rohan Fernando: a road from Sri Lanka to Ames.

Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE·2022
Same journal

Adaptive Dynamics of Quantitative Traits in a Steadily Changing Environment.

Genetics·2026
Same journal

Functional Landscape of Zebrafish Gonadotropins and Receptors: A Comprehensive Genetic Analysis.

Genetics·2026
Same journal

Synergistic actions of Nup43 and Myosin VI drive actin cone assembly during Drosophila spermiogenesis.

Genetics·2026
Same journal

Identification of two Cryptococcus neoformans heme transporters involved in Fhb1-mediated nitrosative stress protection in a fission yeast model.

Genetics·2026
Same journal

Analysis of a hypomorphic mei-P26 mutation reveals coordination between developmental programming of germ cells and meiotic chromosome dynamics.

Genetics·2026
Same journal

Neural and Genetic Mechanisms Regulating Copulation Latency in Male Drosophila melanogaster.

Genetics·2026
See all related articles

This study extends quantitative genetics to include feedback in multivariate models. Ignoring these feedback loops can bias estimates of heritability and genetic correlations.

Area of Science:

  • Quantitative genetics
  • Statistical genetics
  • Behavioral genetics

Background:

  • Multivariate models are crucial in quantitative genetics.
  • Existing models often overlook linear feedback or recursiveness between phenotypes.
  • Ignoring feedback can lead to misinterpretation of genetic parameters.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To extend quantitative genetic theory to incorporate feedback and recursive relationships in multivariate systems.
  • To provide methods for accurate estimation of genetic parameters in complex systems.
  • To address the impact of structural parameters on genetic interpretation.

Main Methods:

  • Developed matrix representations for feedback-recursive systems.
  • Derived likelihood functions under multivariate normality.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Adapted econometric parameter identification techniques.
  • Implemented Bayesian inference using Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods, including Gibbs sampling and Metropolis-Hastings steps for feedback scenarios.

    • Main Results:

    • Demonstrated that structural parameters significantly influence quantitative genetic estimates (heritability, genetic correlation, offspring-parent regression) when feedback is present.
    • Showcased the feasibility of MCMC for complex genetic models.
    • Identified conditions for straightforward Gibbs sampling in fully recursive systems.

    Conclusions:

    • Accurate modeling of feedback and recursiveness is essential for reliable quantitative genetic inference.
    • The proposed Bayesian framework provides a robust approach for analyzing complex multivariate genetic systems.
    • Future extensions can incorporate discrete variables and nonlinear relationships.