Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Decision processes in models of timing.

John H Wearden1

  • 1Department of Psychology, Manchester University, Manchester, UK. wearden@psy.man.ac.uk.

Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis
|July 31, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Before BeT: Behavior and timing in the age of introspection.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2026
Same author

Does temporal reference memory change dynamically during temporal generalization performance?

Psychological research·2025
Same author

Meeting of minds: Skinner and Michotte at the International Congress of Psychology, Stockholm, 1951.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2024
Same author

Filling your time: Auditory flutter alters perceived duration via stimulus-locked responses.

Neuroscience letters·2023
Same author

Can't catch the beat: Failure to find simple repetition effects in three types of temporal judgements.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2023
Same author

The Dawn of the Study of Motor Timing: Wilhelm Camerer (1866) and Karl von Vierordt (1868) on the Time Course of Voluntary Movements.

Motor control·2022

Decision mechanisms, like the thresholded normalized difference (TND), explain timing behaviors in scalar expectancy theory. These mechanisms are crucial for understanding how we judge durations and the challenges in verbal estimation tasks.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Behavioral Science

Background:

  • Scalar expectancy theory (SET) is a leading model for understanding time perception.
  • Decision mechanisms play a critical role within SET, influencing behavior in tasks involving duration judgments.
  • Existing models often lack a detailed account of the decision processes underlying timing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To elucidate the function of decision mechanisms within scalar expectancy theory.
  • To examine the application of decision mechanisms in explaining temporal generalization and bisection behaviors.
  • To explore the commonalities and challenges in modeling timing-related decision processes.

Main Methods:

  • Review and analysis of existing literature on scalar expectancy theory and timing models.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of behavioral data from temporal generalization and bisection tasks.
  • Conceptual modeling of decision mechanisms, specifically the thresholded normalized difference (TND) principle.

    • Main Results:

    • Decision mechanisms are integral to SET, explaining temporal generalization and bisection.
    • The thresholded normalized difference (TND) model provides a unified account for duration similarity and identity judgments.
    • Procedural manipulations can specifically affect threshold values in timing mechanisms.
    • Modeling verbal estimation tasks presents unique challenges for current decision process models.

    Conclusions:

    • The TND principle offers a robust framework for understanding duration discrimination and judgment within timing models.
    • Threshold mechanisms are a key component of timing, susceptible to experimental manipulation.
    • Further research is needed to refine models of decision processes for verbal estimation of time.