Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Methods for pooling results from multi-center studies.

H Worthington1

  • 1Dental Health Unit, 3A Skelton House, Manchester Science Park, Manchester M15 6SH, UK. Helen.Worthington@man.ac.uk

Journal of Dental Research
|August 3, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Enamel Caries Detection and Diagnosis: An Analysis of Systematic Reviews.

Journal of dental research·2021
Same author

Quality of Split-Mouth Trials in Dentistry: 1998, 2008, and 2018.

Journal of dental research·2020
Same author

Cochrane and the COMET initiative: developing the evidence base in oral medicine.

British dental journal·2017
Same author

Open access to journal articles in oncology: current situation and citation impact.

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology·2017
Same author

Surveys on Reporting Guideline Usage in Dental Journals.

Journal of dental research·2016
Same author

A cross-sectional survey of 5-year-old children with non-syndromic unilateral cleft lip and palate: the Cleft Care UK study. Part 1: background and methodology.

Orthodontics & craniofacial research·2015
Same journal

Reorienting Oral Health Promotion through Systems Thinking.

Journal of dental research·2026
Same journal

<i>Porphyromonas gingivalis</i>-Induced NETs Mediate Neuroinflammation via TLR4 Activation.

Journal of dental research·2026
Same journal

Oral Burden of Sjögren Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Journal of dental research·2026
Same journal

Gingival Fibroblast-Driven Osteoimmunology via the IL-33-ILC2-IL-13 Axis.

Journal of dental research·2026
Same journal

Advancing a Global Oral Health Research Agenda.

Journal of dental research·2026
Same journal

YAP/TAZ Drive Oral Leukoplakia Progression and Confer Ferroptosis Vulnerability.

Journal of dental research·2026
See all related articles

This study examines statistical methods for multi-center trials. It highlights the debate between weighted and unweighted analyses, recommending a fixed-effects model for pooling data from multiple research sites.

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trial Design
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • Multi-center studies involve simultaneous data collection across multiple research sites.
  • Key statistical challenges include data pooling and analysis methods.
  • The choice between weighted and unweighted analyses is a central debate.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore statistical considerations for multi-center trial data analysis.
  • To discuss the implications of weighted versus unweighted analyses.
  • To address the use of fixed- versus random-effects models.

Main Methods:

  • Comparison of weighted and unweighted statistical analyses for multi-center data.
  • Investigation of treatment-center interaction effects.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussion of fixed-effects versus random-effects models.

    • Main Results:

    • Unweighted analysis is preferred for detecting treatment-center interactions, yielding unbiased estimates.
    • Weighted analysis offers the most powerful test for treatment contrasts when no interaction exists.
    • Agreement exists among statisticians on using a fixed-effects model.

    Conclusions:

    • The choice of analysis method (weighted vs. unweighted) depends on the presence of treatment-center interaction.
    • Fixed-effects models are generally recommended for multi-center studies.
    • While not strictly necessary, avoiding significant patient number imbalances across sites is advisable.