Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Noncontingent positive and negative feedback during maximal exercise.

A F Kamal1, C Blais

  • 1School of Human Kinetics, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Perceptual and Motor Skills
|August 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Does elective orthopaedic surgery in pandemic era increase risk of developing COVID-19? A combined analysis of retrospective and prospective study at Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia.

Annals of medicine and surgery (2012)·2020
Same author

Wide resection versus curettage with adjuvant therapy for giant cell tumour of bone.

Journal of orthopaedic surgery (Hong Kong)·2016
Same author

Effect of povidone iodine and hydrogen peroxide on fracture healing: a histomorphometric study on rats.

Journal of orthopaedic surgery (Hong Kong)·2016
Same author

Trends in prevalence, incidence and mortality of diagnosed and silent coronary heart disease in Quebec.

Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice·2015
Same author

Efficient information for recognizing pain in facial expressions.

European journal of pain (London, England)·2015
Same author

Quebec Integrated Chronic Disease Surveillance System (QICDSS), an innovative approach.

Chronic diseases and injuries in Canada·2014
Same journal

Theoretical and Psychological Mechanisms of Perceptual-Motor Learning in AI Bots-Assisted Art Education.

Perceptual and motor skills·2026
Same journal

Development and Measurement Properties of a Custom-Built Punch Force Dynamometer Based on S-Type Load Cells.

Perceptual and motor skills·2026
Same journal

Do Elite Taekwondo Athletes Invest Time for Better Choices? Analysis of Anticipatory Behavior Through a Perception-Action Coupling Task.

Perceptual and motor skills·2026
Same journal

Multisensory Contributions in Joint Actions: A Scoping Review.

Perceptual and motor skills·2026
Same journal

Proprioceptive Impairment and Joint Position Exposure Time in Relation to Patient-Report Outcome With Chronic Ankle Instability.

Perceptual and motor skills·2026
Same journal

Static Tactical Diagrams and Imagination: Differential Effects on Novice and Expert Handball Players.

Perceptual and motor skills·2026
See all related articles

External feedback did not significantly alter maximal effort cycling performance. However, athletes perceived positive feedback as accurate and favorable, while negative feedback was deemed inaccurate and unfavorable.

Area of Science:

  • Sports Science
  • Exercise Physiology
  • Psychology of Sport

Background:

  • Understanding the impact of external feedback on athletic performance is crucial.
  • Elite athletes may process feedback differently than non-athletes.
  • Noncontingent feedback, which is not directly earned, presents a unique research area.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how noncontingent external feedback affects maximal effort cycling performance.
  • To examine the influence of feedback on perceived effort.
  • To assess athletes' perceptions of the quality and accuracy of feedback.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a maximal effort bicycle ergometer test.
  • Involved 47 participants, including elite athletes and physical education majors.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Employed a within-subjects design with five 60-second trials under different feedback conditions (positive, negative, combined, none).

    • Main Results:

    • No significant differences in performance were observed across the various feedback conditions.
    • Participants rated positive feedback favorably and accurately.
    • Negative feedback was rated unfavorably and inaccurately.

    Conclusions:

    • External feedback does not appear to significantly impact maximal effort performance in this context.
    • Athletes' subjective evaluation of feedback quality and accuracy is influenced by its valence (positive vs. negative).
    • Findings support the idea that successful athletes may rely less on external attributions for their performance.