Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A simple significance test for quantile regression.

David T Redden1, José R Fernández, David B Allison

  • 1Department of Biostatistics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35294-0022, USA. samndave@uab.edu

Statistics in Medicine
|August 3, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Eating versus skipping breakfast has no discernible effect on obesity-related anthropometric outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

F1000Research·2023
Same author

Aging: What We Can Learn From Elephants.

Frontiers in aging·2022
Same author

Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Among Individuals with Excess Weight: Weight Trajectory Effects.

Current diabetes reports·2022
Same author

Errors and incorrect conclusions need correction in "The low-carbohydrate-diet score is associated with resting metabolic rate: an epidemiologic study among Iranian adults".

Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders·2022
Same author

Estimation of sparse functional quantile regression with measurement error: a SIMEX approach.

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)·2022
Same author

Taking a Hard Look at the Empirical Evidence for Popular Community-Based Interventions in Obesity.

JAMA pediatrics·2022
Same journal

Interpretable Bayesian Modeling for Multireader Multicase Studies: Addressing Overdispersion and Limited Sample Size in Diagnostic Enhancement Evaluation.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Adaptive Sequential Multiple Hypotheses Testing for Concomitant Vaccine Safety Surveillance.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Novel Distance Regression for Repeated Outcomes With Missing Data: Applications to Longitudinal and Crossover Studies of Microbiome Beta-Diversity.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Optimal Weighted Tests for Replication Studies and the 'Two-Trials Rule' With Multiple Hypotheses.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Identifiable Copula-Double-Cox Models: A Fully Parametric Framework for Dependent Right-Censored Survival Data.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Moving From Individualized Risk-Based Prevention to Benefit-Based Prevention: Estimating Individualized Life-Years Gained From Prevention Services as a Basis for Eligibility.

Statistics in medicine·2026
See all related articles

Quantile regression analyzes variable quantiles, unlike OLS regression

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Econometrics
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) regression models the mean of a random variable.
  • Quantile regression extends this by modeling the quantiles of a random variable.
  • Existing methods for testing quantile dependence often rely on computationally intensive resampling or restrictive distributional assumptions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a novel, simple likelihood ratio test for quantile regression.
  • To evaluate the performance of this new test against existing methods.
  • To demonstrate the test's utility in a real-world application.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a likelihood ratio test within a logistic regression framework.
  • Utilized simulated data sets to assess Type I error rates and statistical power.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Compared the proposed test with asymptotic quantile regression tests and bootstrap techniques.
  • Applied the test to NHANES III data on adolescent boys' waist circumference.

    • Main Results:

    • The proposed likelihood ratio test demonstrates appropriate Type I error control.
    • It exhibits comparable statistical power to asymptotic and bootstrap methods.
    • The method is computationally less intensive than existing approaches.
    • The test effectively analyzes the influence of age, ethnicity, and their interaction on waist circumference quantiles.

    Conclusions:

    • The new likelihood ratio test offers a computationally efficient and reliable method for quantile regression inference.
    • It provides a valuable alternative to existing, more complex techniques.
    • The approach is suitable for analyzing complex relationships in observational data, such as those in NHANES III.