Related Experiment Videos
Serological bone markers and joint damage in early polyarthritis
Louise M A Jansen1, Irene van der Horst-Bruinsma, Willem F Lems
1Jan van Breemen Instituut and the Department of Rheumatology, Vrije Universiteit Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
The Journal of Rheumatology
|August 4, 2004
Summary
Serum beta-C-telopeptide (beta-CTx) correlates with radiographic damage and progression in early arthritis. However, this bone resorption marker is less predictive than existing prognostic factors for disease progression.
Area of Science:
- Rheumatology
- Bone Metabolism
- Radiology
Background:
- Osteocalcin (OC) is a bone formation marker, while beta-C-telopeptide (beta-CTx) is a newer serum marker for bone resorption.
- Early inflammatory arthritis, including oligo- and polyarthritis, involves significant bone remodeling and damage.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the relationship between OC, beta-CTx, and radiographic damage in early arthritis patients.
- To assess the predictive value of these bone turnover markers for radiographic progression.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 279 patients with peripheral arthritis and symptom duration under 2 years was studied.
- Serum OC and beta-CTx levels were correlated with disease activity and radiographic damage at baseline and after 2 years.
- Multivariate logistic regression analyzed the additional value of bone markers compared to established prognostic factors.
Main Results:
- Baseline beta-CTx, but not OC, significantly correlated with radiographic damage and disease activity markers (ESR, CRP, DAS28).
- Increased baseline beta-CTx levels were associated with radiographic progression over 2 years.
- In multivariate analysis, beta-CTx did not offer superior prediction of radiographic progression compared to autoantibodies and disease activity measures.
Conclusions:
- Elevated serum beta-CTx levels are linked to radiographic damage and progression in early inflammatory arthritis.
- Despite associations, beta-CTx is not more predictive of radiographic progression than currently used prognostic markers in this patient group.