Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Differences in startle modulation during instructed threat and selective attention.

Koen B E Böcker1, Johanna M P Baas, J Leon Kenemans

  • 1Department of Psychopharmacology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sorbonnelaan 16, NL 3584 CA Utrecht, The Netherlands. K.B.E.Bocker@pharm.uu.nl

Biological Psychology
|August 6, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A collaborative guide to Rapid Invisible Frequency Tagging (RIFT): Methods, insights, and recommendations.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same author

Independent Markers of Attentional Shifts.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same author

Impact of affect labelling as an implicit emotion regulation strategy on negative and positive emotions.

Cognition & emotion·2026
Same author

Dissociating external and internal attentional selection.

iScience·2025
Same author

Microsaccade biases can reflect task-specific spatial memorization strategies.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2025
Same author

The neural correlates of emotion processing and reappraisal as reflected in EEG.

International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology·2024

Attention minimally impacts fear-potentiated startle responses. While both threat and attention tasks engaged participants equally, fear significantly amplified startle reflexes, indicating anxiety

Area of Science:

  • Psychophysiology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Background:

  • Fear-potentiated startle (FPS) is a key indicator of fear learning and anxiety.
  • The role of attentional processes in modulating FPS remains incompletely understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the extent to which attentional processes contribute to FPS.
  • To differentiate between attentional and fear-based contributions to startle modulation.

Main Methods:

  • Comparison of startle reflex potentiation during a threat of shock paradigm versus an attentional control task.
  • Electrophysiological recordings (P300 event-related potentials) to assess attentional engagement.
  • Measurement of baseline and cue-elicited startle amplitudes.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • P300 amplitudes did not differ between threat and attentional control conditions, suggesting comparable attention allocation.
  • Startle potentiation was significantly larger under threat of shock compared to the attentional control condition.
  • Baseline startle was facilitated in the threat condition, potentially reflecting sustained anxiety.

Conclusions:

  • Attentional processes play a minimal role in FPS under these experimental conditions.
  • Fear-specific responses, rather than attention alone, are the primary drivers of FPS.
  • Contextual threat enhances baseline anxiety, influencing overall startle reactivity.