Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Differing operational outcomes with six commercially available automated external defibrillators.

Roman Fleischhackl1, Heidrun Losert, Moritz Haugk

  • 1Department of Emergency Medicine, General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria.

Resuscitation
|August 6, 2004
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Mapping drug-class associations with sudden cardiac arrest in the outpatient setting: an exploratory population-based case-control analysis.

BMJ evidence-based medicine·2026
Same author

Automated Suture Securing Technology in Mitral Valve Surgery: A Strategy to Reduce Prosthetic Dehiscence?

European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery·2026
Same author

High prevalence of factor XIII deficiency and its association with bleeding in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients: an observational study from a prospectively compiled biobank.

Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis·2025
Same author

Erratum: Algorithm for Rapid Exclusion of Clinically Relevant Plasma Levels of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients Using the DOAC Dipstick: An Expert Consensus Paper.

Thrombosis and haemostasis·2025
Same author

Statistical analysis plan for TTVguideIT-a multicentre, patient- and assessor-blinded, non-inferiority, randomised and controlled phase II trial to compare standard and Torque Teno virus-guided immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients in the first year after transplantation.

Trials·2025
Same author

Safety and feasibility of a multimodal approach for orchestra musicians with playing-related musculoskeletal disorders (PRMDs).

Wiener klinische Wochenschrift·2025

Automated external defibrillators (AEDs) show significant differences in user-friendliness, impacting shock delivery and basic life support (BLS) initiation times for untrained rescuers. Design improvements are crucial for faster response.

Area of Science:

  • Emergency Medicine
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Human Factors

Background:

  • Automated external defibrillators (AEDs) are designed for ease of use, but untrained individuals may encounter difficulties.
  • These difficulties can lead to delays in critical interventions, including shock delivery and the initiation of basic life support (BLS).
  • Variations in AED design and voice prompts may influence user performance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the impact of different automated external defibrillator (AED) designs and voice prompts on user performance.
  • To measure the time from first shock to the initiation of basic life support (BLS) in untrained lay rescuers.
  • To identify significant differences in operational outcomes between various AED devices.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Untrained volunteers were assessed using six different AED devices available in Austria.
  • Key metrics recorded included the time to deliver the first shock and the commencement of BLS following AED use.
  • Performance was evaluated based on the AEDs' voice prompts and design features.

    • Main Results:

    • Significant variations were observed in the time taken to deliver the first shock, ranging from 78 to 128 seconds.
    • The type of AED significantly influenced the time to first shock (P < 0.0001).
    • The proportion of volunteers initiating BLS after defibrillation varied widely (33% to 93%) and differed significantly between devices (P < 0.03).

    Conclusions:

    • Substantial differences exist among AED devices regarding critical operational outcomes, specifically time to first shock and BLS initiation.
    • User-friendliness and operational efficiency vary significantly between AED models.
    • Further research and development are essential to optimize AED design for improved usability and faster emergency response.