Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 19, 2026

Measuring Biophysical and Psychological Stress Levels Following Visitation to Three Locations with Differing Levels of Nature
Published on: June 19, 2019
Quantifying environmental factors: a measure of physical, attitudinal, service, productivity, and policy barriers
Gale G Whiteneck1, Cynthia L Harrison-Felix, David C Mellick
1Research Department, Craig Hospital, Englewood, CO 80113, USA.
Objective:
To develop and test a new instrument to assess environmental barriers encountered by people with and without disabilities by using a questionnaire format.
Design:
New instrument development.
Setting:
A rehabilitation hospital and community.
Participants:
Two convenience samples: (1) 97 subjects, 50 with disabilities and 47 without disability, and (2) 409 subjects with disabilities from spinal cord injury, traumatic brain injury, multiple sclerosis, amputation, or auditory or visual impairments. In addition, a population-based sample in Colorado of 2269 people (mean age, 44 y; 57% men) with and without disabilities.
Interventions:
Not applicable.
Main Outcome Measures:
Item development; factor structure; test-retest, subject-proxy and internal consistency reliability; content, construct, and discriminant validity; and subscale and abbreviated version development.
Results:
Panels of experts on disability developed items for the Craig Hospital Inventory of Environmental Factors (CHIEF). The instrument measured the frequency and magnitude of environmental barriers reported by individuals. Five subscales were derived from factor analysis measuring (1) attitudes and support, (2) services and assistance, (3) physical and structural, (4) policy, and (5) work and school environmental barriers. The CHIEF total score had high test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]=.93) and high internal consistency (Cronbach alpha=.93), but lower participant-proxy agreement (ICC=.62). Significant differences were found in CHIEF scores among groups of people with known differences in disability levels and disability categories.
Conclusions:
The CHIEF has good test-retest and internal consistency reliability with evidence of content, construct, and discriminant validity resulting from its development strategy and psychometric assessments in samples of the general population and among people with a variety of disabilities.
Related Concept Videos
Attitudes
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Dimensions of Health and Illness
Factors Affecting Perception
An illustrative example of a perceptual set is the scenario where an airline pilot told...
Impression Management Techniques I: Managing Appearances
Factors Influencing Attraction II: Physical Attraction
