Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Mesosomes and scientific methodology.

Robert G Hudson1

  • 1Department of Philosophy, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.

History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences
|August 7, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same journal

The gendered "stathetic" body: a scientifically informed philosophical approach to corporality.

History and philosophy of the life sciences·2026
Same journal

Plant cognition after Darwin: historical and epistemological remarks.

History and philosophy of the life sciences·2026
Same journal

The vegetal model: Buffon's general theory of reproduction.

History and philosophy of the life sciences·2026
Same journal

Crossing paths: historical and philosophical perspectives on cancer and diabetes classifications.

History and philosophy of the life sciences·2026
Same journal

A computational case study of Günter Blobel's idea of protein topogenesis and its influence.

History and philosophy of the life sciences·2026
Same journal

Primary amoebic meningoencephalitis: discovery and understanding of a novel disease.

History and philosophy of the life sciences·2026
See all related articles

This study refutes the "doctrine of flux" in the philosophy of science. It demonstrates a constancy in experimental methods, proposing "reliable process reasoning" as a framework for understanding scientific discovery.

Area of Science:

  • Philosophy of Science
  • Microbiology
  • History of Science

Background:

  • Nicolas Rasmussen (2001) criticized empirical philosophy of science, citing the mesosome discovery and retraction as evidence of "methodological flux."
  • Rasmussen argued that experimental methods lack constancy, a characteristic he believed pervades all scientific work.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To refute Rasmussen's "doctrine of flux."
  • To re-establish a structured understanding of experimental methods and strategies.
  • To propose an alternative framework for analyzing scientific reasoning.

Main Methods:

  • Re-examination of key research articles from the mesosome episode.
  • Comparative analysis of Rasmussen's findings with original historical data.
  • Identification and codification of consistent methodological patterns.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Contrary to Rasmussen, a constancy of method was identified in the mesosome research.
  • The study proposes "reliable process reasoning" as a consistent feature of experimental practice.
  • This framework offers an alternative to the notion of pervasive "methodological flux."

Conclusions:

  • The mesosome episode does not support Rasmussen's "doctrine of flux."
  • "Reliable process reasoning" provides a more accurate model for understanding experimental science.
  • This research reasserts order in the understanding of scientific methodology.