Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 23, 2026

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task
Published on: July 22, 2025
Inference with legal evidence: common sense is necessary, but not sufficient
1Department of Information Engineering, Aston University, Birmingham. r.matthews@physics.org
Abstract:
Recent cases have highlighted the issue of faulty probabilistic reasoning by expert witnesses in courts of law. While concern about potential miscarriages of justice is clearly well-placed, the consequences of such faulty reasoning do not seem to be fully appreciated. These are often counter-intuitive, as we show with two examples: the Interrogator's Fallacy and the Prosecutor's Fallacy. Both demonstrate the danger of relying solely on 'common sense' when drawing inferences from legal evidence.
Related Concept Videos
Inductive Reasoning
Cause and Effect
Reasoning
Inductive reasoning involves deriving generalizations from specific observations. This type of reasoning helps form beliefs about the world. For example,...
Deductive Reasoning
Eyewitness Memory
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function like a...
Reason and Intuition