Related Experiment Videos
Aesthetics of simulated soiling patterns on architecture
Carlota M Grossi1, Peter Brimblecombe
1School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK. c.grossi-sampedro@uea.ac.uk
Environmental Science & Technology
|August 10, 2004
Summary
Public acceptability of building soiling depends on pattern distribution and level. Uniform and shadowing patterns are preferred, while obscured architectural forms are less acceptable, guiding aesthetic evaluations.
Area of Science:
- Architectural aesthetics
- Environmental psychology
- Building science
Background:
- Building soiling is a common aesthetic issue.
- Public perception of soiling influences building maintenance and design.
- Understanding aesthetic preferences for soiling patterns is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate public acceptability of idealized soiling patterns on buildings.
- To identify key features of soiling that affect aesthetic acceptability.
- To provide insights into spatial factors influencing soiling perception.
Main Methods:
- Utilized two desk-top exercises with simulated soiling patterns on a pedimented window.
- Experiment 1: Respondents ranked images from most to least acceptable.
- Experiment 2: Paired comparison of soiling patterns to determine preferences.
Main Results:
- Uniform patterns and those creating shadowing effects were more acceptable.
- Patterns obscuring architectural forms, especially with non-integer fractal dimensions, were less acceptable.
- A preference for less soiling was noted; verticality and lumpiness were less favored.
Conclusions:
- Both the level and distribution of soiling significantly impact public acceptability.
- Spatial characteristics of soiling patterns play a key role in aesthetic judgment.
- Findings inform strategies for managing building appearance and public perception.