Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Bayesian difference refinement.

T C Terwilliger1, J Berendzen

  • 1Structural Biology Group, Los Alamos National Laboratory, NM 87545, USA. terwilliger@lanl.gov

Acta Crystallographica. Section D, Biological Crystallography
|September 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Recurrent perineal hernia repair: a novel approach.

Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery·2011
Same author

Structural studies of bee melittin.

Biophysical journal·2009
Same author

High throughput crystallography of TB drug targets.

Infectious disorders drug targets·2007
Same author

Bayesian correlated MAD phasing.

Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography·2004
Same author

SAD phasing by combination of direct methods with the SOLVE/RESOLVE procedure.

Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography·2004
Same author

The TB structural genomics consortium: a resource for Mycobacterium tuberculosis biology.

Tuberculosis (Edinburgh, Scotland)·2003
Same journal

Structural insights into the synthesis of FMN in prokaryotic organisms.

Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography·2015
Same journal

Native sulfur/chlorine SAD phasing for serial femtosecond crystallography.

Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography·2015
Same journal

Serial crystallographic analysis of protein isomorphous replacement data from a mixture of native and derivative microcrystals.

Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography·2015
Same journal

The first crystal structure of the peptidase domain of the U32 peptidase family.

Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography·2015
Same journal

Atomic resolution crystal structure of Sapp2p, a secreted aspartic protease from Candida parapsilosis.

Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography·2015
Same journal

Structural characterization of a mitochondrial 3-ketoacyl-CoA (T1)-like thiolase from Mycobacterium smegmatis.

Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography·2015
See all related articles

Bayesian difference refinement improves accuracy for isomorphous structures by combining independent and difference refinement methods. This approach enhances structural comparisons, even with correlated errors or limited data overlap.

Area of Science:

  • Crystallography
  • Structural Biology
  • Computational Chemistry

Background:

  • Comparing isomorphous structures often highlights differences, but correlated model errors or varied data quality can hinder accurate analysis.
  • Independent refinement of isomorphous structures may not yield precise difference estimations when experimental data sets vary.
  • Difference refinement minimizes residuals between observed and calculated structure-factor amplitude differences, proving effective in specific cases.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To extend the applicability of difference refinement using a Bayesian approach.
  • To develop a method for accurate structural comparisons with partial error correlation and limited data overlap.
  • To create a flexible refinement strategy that adapts to varying error correlations between isomorphous models.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

  • Implemented a Bayesian approach to extend difference refinement.
  • Developed a method that smoothly transitions between difference refinement and independent refinement.
  • The Bayesian difference refinement method minimizes residuals based on the degree of model error correlation.

Main Results:

  • The Bayesian difference refinement method accommodates partial correlation in model errors and limited data set overlap.
  • The procedure offers a smooth transition between difference refinement and independent refinement.
  • Refinement strategies adapt: difference refinement for similar errors, independent refinement for dissimilar errors, and a combination for partial correlation.

Conclusions:

  • Bayesian difference refinement provides a more accurate estimation of differences between isomorphous structures.
  • The method is computationally efficient and simple to implement.
  • This approach enhances the analysis of subtle structural variations in macromolecular crystallography.