Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Economic implications of hormesis.

James K Hammitt1

  • 1Center for Risk Analysis, Department of Health Policy and Management, and Department of Environmental Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA. jkh@harvard.edu

Human & Experimental Toxicology
|August 11, 2004
PubMed
Summary

Hormesis, a biological phenomenon, impacts environmental exposure control. Economic analysis can optimize health benefits and minimize costs, with regulations potentially becoming more or less stringent based on hormetic effects and control expenses.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Fair Innings: An Empirical Test.

Health economics·2025
Same author

Monetary values of increasing life expectancy: Sensitivity to shifts of the survival curve.

Journal of risk and uncertainty·2023
Same author

Consistent valuation of a reduction in mortality risk using values per life, life year, and quality-adjusted life year.

Health economics·2023
Same author

Reappraising the public health benefits conferred by environmental policy: Considerations for an aging society.

Journal of the American Geriatrics Society·2022
Same author

Valuing COVID-19 Morbidity Risk Reductions.

Journal of benefit-cost analysis·2022
Same author

Prevention, treatment, and palliative care: The relative value of health improvements under alternative evaluation frameworks.

Journal of health economics·2022

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Health
  • Toxicology
  • Environmental Economics

Background:

  • Hormesis describes a biphasic dose-response relationship where low doses stimulate biological processes, while high doses inhibit them.
  • Traditional models often assume linear dose-response relationships, which may not fully capture the complexities of biological systems.
  • Economic decision-making for environmental exposures typically aims to balance health improvements with the costs of control measures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the economic implications of hormesis for decision-making regarding environmental exposure control.
  • To compare the efficacy of different regulatory approaches under a hormetic model versus traditional models.
  • To assess how uncertainty and individual variability influence optimal exposure control strategies.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

  • Economic analysis framework applied to hormesis.
  • Comparison of optimal control levels under linear no-threshold (LNT) and hormetic models.
  • Evaluation of regulatory instruments considering cost-benefit trade-offs.

Main Results:

  • Hormesis does not fundamentally challenge economic analysis for environmental exposure control.
  • Optimal control levels under hormesis can be less or more stringent than under LNT, depending on incremental control costs.
  • Economic-incentive-based regulations may offer less advantage over command-and-control regulations in a hormetic context.

Conclusions:

  • Hormetic effects necessitate careful consideration in economic assessments of environmental exposures.
  • Optimal population-level control requires balancing individual benefits/harms against control costs, especially with exposure variability or uncertainty.
  • Regulatory strategies may need adaptation to effectively manage exposures exhibiting hormetic properties.