Related Experiment Videos
Accessing university education: perceptions, preferences, and expectations for interpreting by deaf students
1Department of Linguistics, Macquarie University, NSW 2109, Australia. jnapier@ling.mq.edu.au
Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education
|August 12, 2004
Summary
Deaf university students prefer sign language interpreters to blend literal and free styles for better lecture access. They also emphasized the need for interpreters with university qualifications in academic settings.
Area of Science:
- Deaf Studies
- Linguistics
- Education
Background:
- Overview of deaf education in Australia, Australian Sign Language (Auslan), and Auslan interpreting.
- Exploration of the history and current state of sign language interpreting services in higher education.
Observation:
- A panel of deaf university students evaluated two interpreting styles: predominantly free and predominantly literal.
- Students provided feedback on their preferences and expectations regarding Auslan interpreters in university lectures.
Findings:
- Deaf students favored a combined approach, where interpreters switch between literal and free styles as needed.
- This hybrid method allows access to lecture content in Auslan while incorporating English for specialized terminology.
- Students strongly recommended university-level qualifications for interpreters in academic environments.
Implications:
- Findings suggest a need for adaptable interpreting strategies to enhance educational access for deaf students.
- The study highlights the importance of interpreter qualifications and training for effective communication in universities.
- Despite improvements, current interpreting services may not fully meet the complex communication needs of deaf students in higher education.