Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A systematic review of laparoscopic live-donor nephrectomy.

Rebecca L Tooher1, M Mohan Rao, David F Scott

  • 1Australian Safety and Efficacy Register of New Interventional Procedures - Surgical, Royal Australasian College of Surgeons, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

Transplantation
|August 19, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Non-technical Errors, a Hidden Contributor to Patient Mortality in Emergency General Surgery: A National Retrospective Cohort Study.

Annals of surgery·2026
Same author

Extended validation of the mesh integration (MINT) index: a 1-year porcine study.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same author

Surgical Conflicts of Interest: Are They a Problem?

ANZ journal of surgery·2026
Same author

Aortocoronary Versus Composite Grafting Strategies in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: a Network Meta-analysis.

The Canadian journal of cardiology·2026
Same author

Potentially Preventable Mortality After Elective Colorectal Cancer Surgery: Insights From a National Surgical Mortality Audit.

ANZ journal of surgery·2026
Same author

Tale of Two Centres-Exploring Bedside Challenges to Implementing a Clinical Quality Registry for Abdominal Wall Hernias in Metropolitan Australia.

ANZ journal of surgery·2026
Same journal

From Preservation to Repair: Clinical and Ethical Implications of Organ Reconditioning in the era of Machine Perfusion.

Transplantation·2026
Same journal

International Kidney Paired Donation: Implications for India and Other Low- and Middle-income Countries.

Transplantation·2026
Same journal

Meta-analysis of Short-term Clinical and Survival Outcomes of Full-left-full-right Split Liver Transplantation for 2 Recipients.

Transplantation·2026
Same journal

Impact of Social Vulnerability on Future Risk of Metabolic Complications and Survival in Female Liver Transplant Recipients.

Transplantation·2026
Same journal

Near-zero Ischemia After Prolonged Warm Ischemic Time: Beating-heart DCD Heart Transplantation Following Thoracoabdominal Normothermic Regional Perfusion.

Transplantation·2026
Same journal

Metabolic Dysfunction-associated Liver Disease Associated With Poor Food Access and Geographic hot Spots Among Liver Transplant Candidates.

Transplantation·2026
See all related articles

Laparoscopic live-donor nephrectomy (LLDN) appears as safe and effective as open live-donor nephrectomy (OLDN) for donors in the short term. Donor recovery is better with LLDN, but long-term outcomes require further study.

Area of Science:

  • Nephrology
  • Surgical Innovation
  • Transplantation Medicine

Background:

  • Assessing the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic live-donor nephrectomy (LLDN) versus open live-donor nephrectomy (OLDN).
  • Systematic review of comparative studies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare LLDN and OLDN in terms of donor safety and recipient efficacy.
  • To evaluate short-term and long-term outcomes for both donor and recipient.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic literature search from inception to March 2003.
  • Inclusion of randomized and nonrandomized comparative studies of LLDN vs. OLDN.
  • Analysis of 44 studies with average evidence quality.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • No significant difference in donor safety or complication rates between LLDN and OLDN.
  • LLDN showed longer operation times but similar recipient graft function.
  • Superior donor postoperative recovery observed with LLDN.

    • Conclusions:

    • LLDN is comparable to OLDN in short-term safety and efficacy.
    • LLDN offers potential advantages in donor recovery.
    • Further research is needed for long-term donor and recipient outcomes.