Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Low vision rehabilitation: basic concepts and terms.

A Colenbrander, D C Fletcher

    Journal of Ophthalmic Nursing & Technology
    |January 1, 1992
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Evaluation of the NEI visual functioning questionnaire as an interval measure of visual ability in low vision.

    Vision research·2001
    Same author

    Relative locations of macular scotomas near the PRL: effect on low vision reading.

    Journal of rehabilitation research and development·2000
    Same author

    The subspecialty training, practice type, and geographical distribution of recently trained ophthalmologists: a study of male and female physicians.

    Journal of the American Medical Women's Association (1972)·2000
    Same author

    Small incision cataract surgery and placement of posterior chamber intraocular lenses in patients with diabetic retinopathy.

    Ophthalmic surgery and lasers·1999
    Same author

    Preferred retinal loci relationship to macular scotomas in a low-vision population.

    Ophthalmology·1997
    Same author

    Analysis of match algorithms.

    Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·1996
    Same journal

    What lens is that new patient wearing? Identifying, inspecting, and verifying the parameters of rigid and soft contact lenses.

    Journal of ophthalmic nursing & technology·2002
    Same journal

    Monitoring patients at risk for drug-induced opacities.

    Journal of ophthalmic nursing & technology·2002
    Same journal

    Lifestyle is an important factor in good ocular health.

    Journal of ophthalmic nursing & technology·2002
    Same journal

    Contact lens alternatives to laser vision correction.

    Journal of ophthalmic nursing & technology·2002
    Same journal

    Worksheet to calculate permanent visual impairment.

    Journal of ophthalmic nursing & technology·2002
    Same journal

    Optic neuritis in children.

    Journal of ophthalmic nursing & technology·2002
    See all related articles

    Ophthalmic professionals should use precise terminology, distinguishing between vision loss and total blindness. A new classification of normal vision, low vision, and blindness improves accuracy and reduces stigma in patient care.

    Area of Science:

    • Ophthalmology
    • Rehabilitation Counseling
    • Public Health

    Background:

    • Current terminology for vision impairment lacks precision.
    • The dichotomy of legally sighted and legally blind is inadequate.
    • Accurate classification is crucial for effective patient management and reducing stigma.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To advocate for refined terminology in describing vision loss.
    • To promote a more nuanced classification system for visual function.
    • To emphasize the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration in visual rehabilitation.

    Main Methods:

    • Analysis of current terminology used by ophthalmic professionals.
    • Review of existing classification systems for vision impairment.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussion of the roles of ophthalmologists and rehabilitation counselors.

    • Main Results:

    • The term "blindness" is often misused for conditions other than total sight loss.
    • A three-tiered classification (normal vision, low vision, blindness) is more accurate and less stigmatizing.
    • Effective visual rehabilitation requires a team approach with clear communication.

    Conclusions:

    • Adopting precise language, such as differentiating vision loss from blindness, is essential.
    • The proposed classification system offers a more accurate and less stigmatizing framework.
    • Interprofessional collaboration is key to successful visual rehabilitation outcomes.