Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 22, 2026

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task
12:10

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task

Published on: March 4, 2022

Debate-guidelines for GRE control-the case for optimism

S P Barrett1

  • 1Department of Microbiology, Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK. s.barrett@imperial.ac.uk

The Journal of Hospital Infection
|August 24, 2004
PubMed

Insights

Glycopeptide-resistant enterococci (GREs) spread can be controlled. Evidence suggests that limiting antibiotic use and implementing infection control measures effectively reduces GRE prevalence.

Area of Science:

  • Infectious Diseases
  • Microbiology
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Glycopeptide-resistant enterococci (GREs) pose a significant healthcare challenge.
  • The increasing prevalence of GREs mirrors trends seen with other resistant bacteria like methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the factors influencing the spread of GREs.
  • To identify effective interventions for controlling GRE prevalence.
  • To assess the potential for reducing GREs through targeted strategies.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review and analysis of existing studies on GRE epidemiology.
  • Examination of the impact of antibiotic usage patterns on GRE resistance.
  • Evaluation of infection control measures in clinical settings.

Main Results:

  • While GRE spread initially seems relentless, literature indicates successful interventions exist.
  • Control of antibiotic usage has shown particular success in curbing GRE proliferation.
  • Optimism is warranted for further reduction in GRE prevalence with diligent application of control measures.

Conclusions:

  • Effective control of GREs is achievable through strategic interventions.
  • Antibiotic stewardship and comprehensive infection control are key to reducing GRE prevalence.
  • Continued vigilance and application of evidence-based practices can mitigate the threat of GREs.

Related Concept Videos

Unrealistic Optimism Bias01:30

Unrealistic Optimism Bias

Unrealistic optimism bias is the tendency to overestimate the likelihood of positive outcomes. This cognitive bias makes individuals believe they are less likely to experience failures, setbacks, or risks and more likely to succeed than others. For example, people may assume they are less prone to health issues, accidents, or financial struggles than their peers, even when they share similar risk factors.One key component of this bias is the above-average effect, where individuals perceive...
Motivational Bias01:25

Motivational Bias

Cognitive bias results from limitations in thinking and information processing, leading to systematic errors in judgment. Conversely, motivational bias stems from personal desires or emotions, causing distortions in perception to align with self-interest. Motivational bias influences how individuals perceive and attribute causes to events, often shaped by personal needs, goals, and self-esteem preservation. This bias can distort judgment, leading to inaccurate assessments of success, failure,...
Self-Discrepancy Theory02:45

Self-Discrepancy Theory

One influential perspective on what motivates people's behavior is detailed in Tory Higgin's self-discrepancy theory (Higgins, 1987). He proposed that people hold disagreeing internal representations of themselves that lead to different emotional states.
Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?01:17

Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?

The outcome of any hypothesis testing leads to rejecting or not rejecting the null hypothesis. This decision is taken based on the analysis of the data, an appropriate test statistic, an appropriate confidence level, the critical values, and P-values. However, when the evidence suggests that the null hypothesis cannot be rejected, is it right to say, 'Accept' the null hypothesis?
There are two ways to indicate that the null hypothesis is not rejected. 'Accept' the null hypothesis and 'fail to...
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now?