Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Why voxel-based morphometric analysis should be used with great caution when characterizing group differences.

Christos Davatzikos1

  • 1Section of Biomedical Image Analysis, Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. christos@rad.upenn.edu

Neuroimage
|August 25, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The genetic architecture of multimodal human brain age.

Nature communications·2024
Same author

Distance-weighted Sinkhorn loss for Alzheimer's disease classification.

iScience·2024
Same author

Integrating imaging and genomic data for the discovery of distinct glioblastoma subtypes: a joint learning approach.

Scientific reports·2024
Same author

Plasma Biomarkers as Predictors of Progression to Dementia in Individuals with Mild Cognitive Impairment.

Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD·2024
Same author

Genetic and Clinical Correlates of AI-Based Brain Aging Patterns in Cognitively Unimpaired Individuals.

JAMA psychiatry·2024
Same author

Dimensional Neuroimaging Endophenotypes: Neurobiological Representations of Disease Heterogeneity Through Machine Learning.

ArXiv·2024
Same journal

Category-selective neural decreases in the human ventral occipito-temporal cortex as defined with intracranial recordings.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

EEG-Based Brain Fingerprints Elicited by Focal Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the Primary Motor Cortex.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

The Association between Brain Oscillatory Activity and Immediate Memory under Different Magnetoencephalography Paradigms: A population-based Study.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Brain response to awe experiences in virtual reality: an integrated linear and nonlinear EEG analysis.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Convergent imaging and genetic signatures of gray matter atrophy in Parkinson's disease.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

What actually matters in multi-compartment EEG head models: A controlled FEM study of parcellation granularity, skull layering, mesh quality, noise, and inverse solver.

NeuroImage·2026
See all related articles

Voxel-based statistics in neuroimaging are limited for detecting complex brain morphology changes. Advanced statistical learning methods may offer a more comprehensive approach to understanding factors like disease and aging effects on the brain.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroimaging
  • Brain Morphology Analysis
  • Statistical Methods in Neuroscience

Background:

  • Voxel-based morphometry (VBM) is widely used in neuroimaging for statistical analysis of brain structure.
  • Current VBM methods, relying on voxel-based statistics, are prevalent for constructing statistical parametric maps.
  • These methods have limitations in accurately characterizing complex, subtle, or non-linear morphological differences between groups.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the limitations of current voxel-based statistics in neuroimaging.
  • To highlight the bias of voxel-based statistics towards localized and linear group differences.
  • To propose alternative statistical learning methods for more comprehensive brain morphology analysis.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Commentary on existing voxel-based statistical methods.
  • Discussion of the inherent biases and limitations of voxel-based statistics.
  • Exploration of statistical learning theory as an alternative approach.

    • Main Results:

    • Voxel-based statistics are significantly less effective for spatially complex and subtle morphological differences.
    • Effectiveness is biased towards highly localized and linear group differences.
    • Complex factors like age, sex, genotype, and disease can induce subtle, non-linear brain changes not well-captured by current methods.

    Conclusions:

    • Voxel-based statistics are insufficient for fully characterizing complex brain morphology variations.
    • Statistical learning methods offer a more promising, unbiased approach for quantifying brain changes.
    • Future research should focus on network-level analyses and statistical learning for understanding disease-related brain alterations.