Related Experiment Videos
Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with goldmann applanation tonometry
Claude Kaufmann1, Lucas M Bachmann, Michael A Thiel
1Department of Ophthalmology, University of Zurich, Switzerland.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science
|August 25, 2004
Summary
The dynamic contour tonometer (DCT) offers reliable intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements, showing high concordance with Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) but without corneal influence. DCT also demonstrates lower variability, making it suitable for clinical use.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Optometry
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement is crucial for diagnosing and managing glaucoma.
- Traditional tonometers like Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) are influenced by corneal properties.
- The dynamic contour tonometer (DCT; Pascal tonometer) is a novel device designed for IOP measurement independent of corneal biomechanics.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the dynamic contour tonometer (DCT) with the Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT).
- To assess the influence of ocular structural factors on IOP readings from both devices.
- To evaluate the intra- and interobserver variability of DCT and GAT in healthy subjects.
Main Methods:
- A prospective study involving 228 eyes.
- Comparison of IOP measurements obtained by GAT and DCT.
- Analysis of the effects of central corneal thickness (CCT), corneal curvature, axial length, and anterior chamber depth on IOP readings.
- Evaluation of intra- and interobserver variability by four observers measuring IOP in eight eyes.
Main Results:
- High concordance was observed between DCT and GAT IOP readings.
- DCT readings were consistently higher than GAT readings (median difference: +1.7 mm Hg).
- Unlike GAT, DCT readings showed no significant influence from CCT, corneal curvature, astigmatism, anterior chamber depth, or axial length.
- DCT exhibited significantly lower intraobserver (0.65 mm Hg vs. 1.1 mm Hg) and interobserver (0.44 mm Hg vs. 1.28 mm Hg) variability compared to GAT.
Conclusions:
- DCT provides IOP measurements highly concordant with GAT but independent of corneal properties.
- DCT demonstrates superiorly low intra- and interobserver variability.
- The DCT is a suitable and reliable method for routine clinical tonometry.