Related Experiment Videos
Total energy expenditure estimated using a foot-contact pedometer
William J Tharion1, Miyo Yokota, Mark J Buller
1U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine, Natick, MA 01760, USA. william.tharion@na.amedd.army.mil
Summary
A new pedometry method (TEEpedo) accurately estimates total energy expenditure (TEE) in moderate ranges (9-14 MJ/day) compared to doubly labeled water (DLW). However, TEEpedo may underestimate high TEEs due to unmeasured upper body activity.
Area of Science:
- Exercise Physiology
- Biomedical Engineering
- Human Kinetics
Background:
- Total energy expenditure (TEE) assessment is crucial for understanding human metabolism.
- Doubly labeled water (DLW) is a gold standard but expensive and complex.
- Pedometry offers a potentially simpler and more cost-effective alternative for TEE assessment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate a novel pedometry-based method (TEEpedo) for estimating TEE.
- To compare the accuracy of TEEpedo against the established DLW method (TEEdlw).
- To determine the conditions under which TEEpedo provides reliable TEE measurements.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 7 men and 10 women shipboard sailors participated in an 8-day study.
- TEE was estimated using TEEpedo, incorporating total body weight, foot-ground contact times (Tc) during various activities (running, walking, NEAT), and resting metabolic rate (RMR).
- RMR was calculated from lean body mass, and activity energy cost was derived from Tc and time spent in each activity.
Main Results:
- The TEEpedo method explained 79% of the variance in TEE compared to TEEdlw.
- Mean TEE estimated by TEEpedo (12.65+/-3.1 MJ/day) did not significantly differ from the mean TEEdlw (12.55+/-3.3 MJ/day).
- The 95% confidence interval for TEEpedo relative to TEEdlw was +/-0.81 MJ/day.
Conclusions:
- The TEEpedo method provides accurate TEE estimates for moderate energy expenditure levels (9-14 MJ/day).
- At higher TEEs (>14 MJ/day), TEEpedo tended to underestimate actual expenditure, potentially due to unmeasured upper body movements.
- This pedometry-based approach offers a promising, less invasive alternative for TEE assessment in specific contexts.