Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Laparoscopic versus abdominal hysterectomy.

F Nezhat1, C Nezhat, S Gordon

  • 1Fertility and Endoscopy Center and Laser Endoscopy Institute, Atlanta, GA 30342.

The Journal of Reproductive Medicine
|March 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Verification imaging in prostate MR-only radiotherapy: Are fiducial markers necessary?

Radiography (London, England : 1995)·2024
Same author

A proof of concept that experience-based management of endometriosis can complement evidence-based guidelines.

Facts, views & vision in ObGyn·2023
Same author

The first patients treated with MR-CBCT soft-tissue matching in a MR-only prostate radiotherapy pathway.

Radiography (London, England : 1995)·2023
Same author

Is stopping secondary prophylaxis safe in HIV-positive talaromycosis patients? Experience from Myanmar.

HIV medicine·2020
Same author

Integration of HIV services with primary care in Yangon, Myanmar: a retrospective cohort analysis.

HIV medicine·2020
Same author

Associations between food environment typologies and body mass index: Evidence from Yorkshire, England.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2019
Same journal

Elective Procedures in Obstetrics and Gynecology During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

The Journal of reproductive medicine·2022
Same journal

Choriocarcinoma in Situ in a Partial Hydatidiform Mole A: Case Report.

The Journal of reproductive medicine·2018
Same journal

Isolated Recurrent Hematotrachelos After Abdominal Myomectomy A Case Report.

The Journal of reproductive medicine·2018
Same journal

Live Birth from Electively Cryopreserved Oocytes: A Feasible Option for Couples Opposed to Embryo Cryopreservation A Case Report.

The Journal of reproductive medicine·2018
Same journal

Prevalence and Risk Factors of Ejaculation Failure on the Day of Operation Among Chinese Males Undergoing Assisted Reproductive Technique Treatments.

The Journal of reproductive medicine·2018
Same journal

Efficacy and Safety of Perioperative Use of Epinephrine for Laparoscopic Myomectomy in Infertile Women with Symptomatic Solitary Intramural Uterine Fibroids A Randomized Clinical Trial.

The Journal of reproductive medicine·2018
See all related articles

Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy offers faster recovery and fewer complications than abdominal hysterectomy. This minimally invasive approach is preferable for selected patients when performed by experienced surgeons.

Area of Science:

  • Gynecology
  • Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • Surgical Outcomes

Background:

  • Hysterectomy is a common gynecological procedure.
  • Abdominal hysterectomy has a well-established recovery profile.
  • Laparoscopic techniques offer potential benefits in surgical recovery.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the perioperative and postoperative outcomes of total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) versus laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH).
  • To evaluate patient recovery, hospitalization duration, and complication rates between the two surgical methods.

Main Methods:

  • A comparative study involving 20 women undergoing hysterectomy.
  • Ten patients underwent total abdominal hysterectomy.
  • Ten patients underwent laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • LAVH required a longer operative time (160 minutes) compared to TAH (102 minutes).
  • LAVH patients experienced shorter hospital stays (2.4 days vs. 4.4 days).
  • LAVH resulted in quicker recuperation (3 weeks vs. 5 weeks) and fewer complications.

Conclusions:

  • Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy demonstrates superior outcomes in terms of hospitalization and recovery compared to abdominal hysterectomy.
  • For selected candidates and experienced surgeons, LAVH appears to be the preferable surgical approach.