Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Search for a category target in clutter.

Mary J Bravo1, Hany Farid

  • 1Department of Psychology, Rutgers University, Camden, NJ 08102, USA. mbravo@camden.rutgers.edu

Perception
|August 28, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Mitigating the harms of manipulated media: Confronting deepfakes and digital deception.

PNAS nexus·2025
Same author

People are poorly equipped to detect AI-powered voice clones.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

The making of an AI news anchor-and its implications.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2023
Same author

The art of the float.

Journal of vision·2023
Same author

Art and the science of generative AI.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2023
Same author

A comparative analysis of human and AI performance in forensic estimation of physical attributes.

Scientific reports·2023
Same journal

Predictive models and parameter analysis for multiple tactile perceptions in skin-wet fabrics interface.

Perception·2026
Same journal

High-resolution kitsch by AI: Why society needs art, not more AI content.

Perception·2026
Same journal

Benchmarking spatial discrimination thresholds of two-frame motion defined forms compared to luminance and stereoscopic defined forms.

Perception·2026
Same journal

The effect of face masks on the perception of trustworthiness and competence in individuals with autistic traits.

Perception·2026
Same journal

The importance of external features for categorizing ethnicity: can Koreans identify Korean, Japanese, and Chinese faces?

Perception·2026
Same journal

Interoception, alexithymia, and motor congruency: Psychological drivers of body ownership in virtual reality.

Perception·2026
See all related articles

Object search in cluttered environments is challenging. Compound objects, with multiple parts, slow down visual search more than simple objects, especially in dense displays.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Visual Perception
  • Human-Computer Interaction

Background:

  • Visual search tasks, like airport security screening, often involve poorly defined targets in cluttered environments.
  • Under such conditions, search may rely on item-by-item processing of familiar objects.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether the complexity of objects (simple vs. compound) affects visual search performance, particularly in cluttered displays.
  • To determine if object segmentation processes are influenced by object complexity and display density.

Main Methods:

  • Participants searched for targets within broad categories (e.g., food) presented in visual displays.
  • Objects were either simple (uniform color/texture) or compound (multiple distinct parts).
  • Displays varied in density, from sparse arrays to dense clutter.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • In sparse displays, search times were similar for simple and compound objects.
  • In dense clutter, search times increased more significantly for compound objects compared to simple objects.
  • Compound objects showed steeper search functions in clutter, suggesting segmentation difficulties.

Conclusions:

  • Object complexity significantly impacts visual search efficiency in cluttered environments.
  • The number of object parts, not just the number of objects, influences search rates in clutter.
  • Bottom-up grouping processes are less effective in segmenting compound objects within dense visual clutter.