Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The learning curve: implications of a quantitative analysis.

Charles R Gallistel1, Stephen Fairhurst, Peter Balsam

  • 1Rutgers Center for Cognitive Science, 152 Frelinghuysen Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854-8020, USA. galliste@ruccs.rutgers.edu

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
|August 28, 2004
PubMed
Summary

Group averaging masks rapid learning in individuals. Individual learning curves show abrupt increases, suggesting an evidence-based decision process, not gradual associative strength changes. Latency is the key learning measure.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Both probability and rate of reinforcement can affect the acquisition and maintenance of conditioned responses.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition·2024
Same author

Learning depends on the information conveyed by temporal relationships between events and is reflected in the dopamine response to cues.

Science advances·2024
Same author

Time-scale invariant contingency yields one-shot reinforcement learning despite extremely long delays to reinforcement.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2024
Same author

Formalising the role of behaviour in neuroscience.

The European journal of neuroscience·2024
Same author

Dopamine transporter blockade during adolescence increases adult dopamine function, impulsivity, and aggression.

Molecular psychiatry·2023
Same author

Honey bees infer source location from the dances of returning foragers.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2023

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral neuroscience
  • Cognitive psychology
  • Animal learning

Background:

  • Traditional learning curves often show gradual increases.
  • Group averaging is a common practice in analyzing learning data.
  • This approach may obscure individual learning dynamics.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the true nature of learning curves in common animal models.
  • To determine if gradual learning curves reflect actual learning processes or artifacts.
  • To propose alternative methods for measuring learning rates.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of individual learning data across multiple paradigms (pigeon autoshaping, rabbit/rat eye-blink conditioning, rat maze tasks, mouse water maze).
  • Comparison of individual learning curves with group-averaged curves.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of the steepness of individual learning onset compared to psychometric functions.

    • Main Results:

    • Group-averaged learning curves are artifacts, masking rapid, step-like learning in individuals.
    • Individual learning shows abrupt increases from untrained to trained levels.
    • The onset of conditioned behavior resembles stimulus detection, suggesting an evidence-based decision process.

    Conclusions:

    • Gradual learning curves result from averaging individual step-function learning.
    • Learning rate estimation from group averages is inaccurate.
    • Individual response latency is a more reliable measure of learning onset.