Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 10, 2026

A Two-Step Method for Percutaneous Transhepatic Choledochoscopic Lithotomy
Published on: September 13, 2022
Results of shockwave lithotripsy for pediatric urolithiasis
A H Tan1, M Al-Omar, J D Watterson
1Division of Urology, St. Joseph's Health Care, University of Western Ontario; London, Ontario, Canada.
Insights
Shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) shows moderate efficacy for pediatric urolithiasis, with a 60.2% stone-free rate after one session. Patients with risk factors or large stones may benefit more from alternative endourologic procedures.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Urology
- Nephrolithiasis Management
- Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy
Background:
- Pediatric urolithiasis management often involves shockwave lithotripsy (SWL).
- Efficacy, ancillary procedure needs, and complications of SWL in children require further definition compared to adults.
- This study reviews SWL outcomes in pediatric patients at a dedicated lithotripsy unit.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy and outcomes of SWL in pediatric patients with urolithiasis.
- To identify factors influencing SWL success in children.
- To compare SWL outcomes in pediatric patients with and without risk factors.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 100 pediatric patients (=16 years) treated with SWL between 1991 and 2002.
- Analysis of 115 stones and 131 SWL procedures, including stone characteristics, risk factors, anesthesia, and complications.
- Stone-free status determined by imaging at 3-month follow-up; efficiency quotient (EQ) calculated.
Main Results:
- Risk factors were present in 27% of children; these patients had significantly lower stone-free rates (31.7% vs. 64.7%) after one SWL session (P < 0.001).
- Initial SWL achieved a 60.2% stone-free rate, with a retreatment rate of 13.9%.
- Overall stone-free rate increased to 68% after a second treatment; EQ was 54.3%. Minor complications occurred in 4.6% of patients.
Conclusions:
- Single-session SWL demonstrates moderate efficacy for pediatric urolithiasis based on strict success criteria.
- Pediatric patients with large stones or risk factors (e.g., anatomic abnormalities) are less likely to achieve stone-free status with SWL.
- Endourologic procedures may be a more suitable option for pediatric patients with challenging stone burdens or associated risk factors.
Background And Purpose:
Shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) is widely practiced in the management of pediatric urolithiasis. However, the efficacy, need for ancillary procedures, and treatment-related complications are not as clearly defined as in the adult population. We reviewed the outcomes of SWL in the pediatric population at our lithotripsy unit.
Patients And Methods:
A retrospective review of all patients =16 years of age treated with SWL between January 1991 and June 2002 was undertaken. One hundred patients with 115 stones underwent 131 SWL procedures (115 first treatments, 16 retreatments). The mean age was 10.7 years (range 10 months-16 years). Stone locations were as follows: caliceal 42.6%, renal pelvic 27%, and ureteral (30.4%). The mean stone size was 7.8 mm (range 2-23 mm). Risk factors for stone formation, the need for secondary therapies, and treatment-related complications were noted. The stone-free rate for a single-session SWL procedure, defined as complete absence of stone fragments on plain film, intravenous urography, or renal ultrasonography, was calculated based on 3-month follow-up. The efficiency quotient (EQ) was also calculated.
Results:
Risk factors were identified in 31 children (27.0%), including metabolic and anatomic abnormalities. Patients with a risk factor were less likely to be stone free after one SWL session than those without risk factors (31.7% v 64.7%; P < 0.001). General (74.8%), neurolept (24.4%), and epidural (0.8%) anesthesia were utilized. Ureteral stents were placed in 25% of treatments. There were no intraoperative complications. Minor complications were seen in 4.6% of patients. Ancillary procedures were required in 10 patients. Following initial SWL treatment, 60.2% of patients were stone free. The retreatment rate was 13.9%. Following a second treatment, the stone-free rate increased to 68%. The EQ was 54.3.
Conclusion:
Employing a strict definition of treatment success, single-session SWL in our series offers moderate efficacy in the pediatric population. Patients who have a large stone or risk factor such as an anatomic abnormality are less likely to become stone free and might better undergo an endourologic procedure.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Urinary Tract Calculi I: Introduction
Urinary Tract Calculi III: Medical Management
Urinary Tract Calculi IV: Nutrition Therapy and Prevention
Urinary Tract Calculi V: Nursing Management
Urinary Tract Calculi VI: Surgical Management
Imaging Studies V: Intravenous Urography and Retrograde Pyelography

