Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 22, 2026

Lumped-Parameter and Finite Element Modeling of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction
Published on: February 13, 2021
Aortic valve stenosis: fatal natural history despite normal left ventricular function and low invasive peak-to-peak
Kent Lodberg Christensen1, Hanne Ramløv Ivarsen, Leif Thuesen
1Department of Cardiology B, University Hospital of Aarhus, Skejby Sygehus, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Insights
The peak-to-peak gradient is not a reliable indicator for aortic stenosis (AS) valve replacement decisions. A low gradient can still signify severe AS, even with normal left ventricular function, impacting patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiovascular Imaging
- Valvular Heart Disease
Background:
- Historically, cardiac catheterization and its derived peak-to-peak gradient were central to assessing valvular aortic stenosis (AS) severity.
- Decisions for aortic valve replacement (AVR) often relied heavily on this invasive pressure measurement and left ventricular function.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the diagnostic accuracy and reproducibility of cardiac catheterization, transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) for AS evaluation.
- To refine the strategy for managing patients with AS, particularly concerning AVR decisions.
Main Methods:
- A prospective study involving 150 consecutive AS patients from 1994-1997.
- Systematic assessment using cardiac catheterization, TTE, and TEE.
- Follow-up evaluation of patient outcomes based on treatment decisions.
Main Results:
- TTE, TEE, and cardiac catheterization demonstrated similar accuracy and reproducibility in determining aortic valve area.
- Relying on TTE for management aligns with current recommendations due to its speed and patient comfort.
- 12 patients with low peak-to-peak gradients (<50 mm Hg) but significant valve area reduction and symptoms were denied AVR, leading to adverse outcomes including death and worsening heart failure.
Conclusions:
- The peak-to-peak gradient should not be a primary factor in deciding on AVR for AS patients.
- A low peak-to-peak gradient does not rule out severe AS, even with preserved left ventricular function.
- Current guidelines favoring TTE for AS assessment are supported by this study's findings.
Abstract:
For many years, the severity of valvular aortic stenosis (AS) was evaluated mainly on the basis of cardiac catheterization. In many centers, the handy peak-to-peak transvalvular pressure difference or 'peak-to-peak gradient' in relation to left ventricular function was used as a crucial feature in taking a decision regarding valve substitution. In a prospective study during the period 1994-1997, 150 consecutive patients with AS were examined systematically using cardiac catherization as well as transthoracic (TTE) and transesophageal echocardiography. The study was performed in order to compare the diagnostic accuracy and reproducibility of the three modalities with the purpose of improving our evaluation strategy. We found that the three methods were able to determine the aortic valve area with similar accuracy and reproducibility. The data thus support earlier papers and the currently recommended strategy of managing most patients on the basis of TTE since this approach is more rapid and gentle to the patients. In accordance with the past policy of our department, however, considerable weight was put on the invasive data during the study period. Thus, 12 patients with invasive peak-to-peak gradient <50 mm Hg and no severe depression of left ventricular function were not offered valve replacement, despite symptoms and significant valve area reductions. At 2.5 years of follow-up, 6 had died, 3 of severe heart failure, 2 while awaiting scheduled valve replacement, and 1 during aortocoronary bypass surgery. Another 3 patients later experienced further symptom progression and underwent successful aortic valve replacement. In the remaining 3 patients, all free from coronary stenoses and other valvular heart disease than AS, heart failure symptoms had worsened considerably during continued medical therapy. In conclusion, we do not recommend consideration of the peak-to-peak gradient in the process of deciding whether or not AS patients should receive valve replacement. A low peak-to-peak gradient does not exclude severe AS, even in the presence of preserved left ventricular function.
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Regurgitation I: Introduction
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
