Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 22, 2026

Chromatographic Fingerprinting by Template Matching for Data Collected by Comprehensive Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography
Published on: September 2, 2020
Effects of pressure drop on absolute retention matching in comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography
Robert Shellie1, Philip Marriott, Paul Morrison
1Australian Centre for Research on Separation Science, Department of Applied Chemistry, RMIT University, GPO Box 2476V Melbourne, Victoria 3001, Australia.
Abstract:
Comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography (GC x GC) analysis has the capability to resolve many more components of complex mixtures than traditional single column GC analysis. There is an increasing need to provide reliable identification of these separated components; time-of-flight mass spectrometry (TOFMS) is the most appropriate technology to achieve this task. Rather than require MS for all GC x GC separations, it is desirable to assign peak identities to specific peak positions in the GC x GC separation space, and this necessitates matching peak retentions in the two experiments - GC x GC-FID and GC x GC-TOFMS. The atmospheric vs. vacuum outlet conditions confound this task. It is shown here that by employing a supplementary gas supply, provided to a T-union between the column outlet and the MS interface, it is possible to generate 2D chromatograms for GC x GC-FID and GC x GC-TOFMS that are essentially exactly matched. There is no degradation in separation performance or efficiency in the second column in the system interfaced to the T-union. Since the GC x GC-FID experiment uses hydrogen for maximum efficiency, and GC x GC-TOFMS uses helium carrier, translation of (conditions/retentions) must account for the different viscosities of the carrier gases. Translation of conditions is based on well-known principles established in single column analysis. Tabulated data illustrate that retention reproducibility was of the order of better than 4 s for the average first dimension retention difference, and about 40 ms for the average second dimension retention difference when comparing GC x GC-FID and GC x GC-TOFMS results. This should provide considerable support for identification in routine GC x GC-FID analysis of specific sample types, once the peaks in 2D separation space have been assigned identities through GC x GC-TOFMS analysis.
Related Concept Videos
Gas Chromatography: Types of Columns and Stationary Phases
For an analyte to remain on the column for a sufficient amount of time, it must exhibit some level of compatibility (or...
Chromatographic Resolution
The effectiveness of separation can be evaluated by determining the level of separation between two neighboring peaks in a chromatogram, which represents the individual components of a sample.
In chromatography,...
Chromatographic Methods: Terminology
Gas Chromatography: Introduction
In GC, a sample is vaporized and mixed with an inert carrier gas (the mobile phase), which transports it through a column.
Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry (GC–MS)
A gas chromatograph consists of a long, narrow capillary column with a polysiloxane coating on the inner wall. The coating...
Silica Gel Column Chromatography: Overview
Polar components tend to bind strongly to the silica gel, causing them to move slowly through the column. In contrast, nonpolar compounds...

