Magnetic resonance with manganese-DPDP (mangafodipir) of focal solid pancreatic lesions
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 22, 2026

Multianimal Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Tumor Measurements in Pancreatic Cancer Mouse Models
Published on: February 3, 2026
Alessandro Zanello1, Roberto Nicoletti, Paolo Brambilla
1Servizio e Cattedra di Radiologia, Università Vita-Salute IRCCS H San Raffaele, Milan. zanello.alessandro@hsr.it
Purpose:
To assess the accuracy of magnetic resonance (MR) with Mangafodipir (Mn-DPDP) in the identification of focal solid pancreatic lesions. The possibility of lesion characterisation based on quantification of Mn uptake was also investigated.
Materials And Methods:
Thirty-four patients (11 females, 23 males, aged 21-75, mean age 57) selected at sonography (US) and spiral CT (SCT) for clinically suspected focal solid pancreatic lesion, were studied between June 2000 and July 2001. Patients eligible for surgery underwent MR imaging (1.5 T) before and after infusion of 5 micromol/kg of Mn-DPDP (0.5 ml/kg Teslascan, Nycomed Amersham Health, Oslo, Norway). The baseline examination included FSE T2-weighted sequences and fat-saturated and non fat-saturated breath-hold gradient-echo T1-weighted sequences (FMP SPGR). After Teslascan infusion, fat-saturated and non fat-saturated FMP SPGR sequences were repeated. Thirty of the 34 patients had a definitive diagnosis provided by reference standards such as post-operative histology (22 cases), cytology (FNAB) and/or a follow-up period of at least 6 months (8 patients). As regards lesion characterisation, the signal-to-noise ratio (S/N ratio) and contrast-to-noise ratio (C/N ratio) of lesions compared to the pancreatic parenchyma were calculated using ROIs before and after contrast infusion.
Results:
The definitive diagnosis was pancreatic malignancy in 18 patients, focal pancreatitis in 5 and neuroendocrine tumours in 3. Four patients with suspected lesions at US and/or SCT were free of focal pancreatic disease. Mn-DPDP MR identified 17/18 malignancies, 2/3 endocrine neoplasms 5/5 focal pancreatitis; the 4 patients with no pancreatic lesions were correctly identified. The Mn-DPDP MR accuracy in detecting focal pancreatic solid lesions was 93%. MR missed 1 small adenocarcinoma (the only pT1 in our group) and 1 insulinoma (with Mn uptake similar to the surrounding parenchyma). Due to the small number of inflammatory lesions included in the study, no significant differences were found in signal intensity and Mn-DPDP uptake between focal pancreatitis and neoplasms.
Conclusions:
MR with Mn-DPDP is very accurate in the identification of focal solid pancreatic lesions. Mangafodi-pir is also very useful for excluding the presence of pancreatic lesions suspected at US or CT. The characterisation of lesions, in particular of inflammatory versus neoplastic lesions, remains problematic and requires further investigation.
Insights
Magnetic resonance (MR) with Mangafodipir (Mn-DPDP) accurately identifies focal solid pancreatic lesions, proving highly effective in excluding disease. Further research is needed to characterize lesion types, particularly distinguishing inflammatory from neoplastic conditions.
Area of Science:
- Radiology and Imaging
- Gastroenterology
- Oncology
Background:
- Focal solid pancreatic lesions require accurate diagnostic methods for timely intervention.
- Conventional imaging techniques like ultrasound (US) and spiral CT (SCT) may have limitations in lesion detection and characterization.
- Mangafodipir (Mn-DPDP) is a contrast agent investigated for its potential in magnetic resonance imaging (MR).
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of MR imaging using Mangafodipir (Mn-DPDP) for identifying focal solid pancreatic lesions.
- To explore the utility of quantifying Mn uptake for lesion characterization.
- To assess the efficacy of Mn-DPDP enhanced MR in differentiating pancreatic lesions from normal parenchyma.
Main Methods:
- Thirty-four patients with suspected focal solid pancreatic lesions underwent MR imaging (1.5 T) before and after Mn-DPDP administration.
- Standard MR sequences included T2-weighted and gradient-echo T1-weighted imaging.
- Lesion characterization involved calculating signal-to-noise (S/N) and contrast-to-noise (C/N) ratios compared to pancreatic parenchyma.
Main Results:
- Mn-DPDP enhanced MR demonstrated a 93% accuracy in detecting focal solid pancreatic lesions.
- The study correctly identified malignancies (17/18), endocrine neoplasms (2/3), and focal pancreatitis (5/5).
- One small adenocarcinoma and one insulinoma were missed; differentiation between inflammatory and neoplastic lesions based on Mn uptake was not significant.
Conclusions:
- MR imaging with Mn-DPDP is highly accurate for detecting focal solid pancreatic lesions.
- Mn-DPDP enhanced MR is valuable for excluding pancreatic lesions initially suspected by US or SCT.
- Further investigation is required to improve the characterization of pancreatic lesions, especially differentiating inflammatory from neoplastic types.
Related Concept Videos
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging

