Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 22, 2026

Measuring the Mechanical Properties of Glass Fiber Reinforcement Polymer Composite Laminates Obtained by Different Fabrication Processes
Published on: June 30, 2023
Biaxial flexural strength and microstructure changes of two recycled pressable glass ceramics
Mohammad Albakry1, Massimiliano Guazzato, Michael Vincent Swain
1Biomaterials Science Research Unit, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Sydney, United Dental Hospital, Surry Hills, NSW 2010, Australia.
Purpose:
This study evaluated the biaxial flexural strength and identified the crystalline phases and the microstructural features of pressed and repressed materials of the glass ceramics, Empress 1 and Empress 2.
Materials And Methods:
Twenty pressed and 20 repressed disc specimens measuring 14 mm x 1 mm per material were prepared following the manufacturers' recommendations. Biaxial flexure (piston on 3-ball method) was used to assess strength. X-ray diffraction was performed to identify the crystalline phases, and a scanning electron microscope was used to disclose microstructural features.
Results:
Biaxial flexural strength, for the pressed and repressed specimens, respectively, were E1 [148 (SD 18) and 149 (SD 35)] and E2 [340 (SD 40), 325 (SD 60)] MPa. There was no significant difference in strength between the pressed and the repressed groups of either material, Empress 1 and Empress 2 (p > 0.05). Weibull modulus values results were E1: (8, 4.7) and E2: (9, 5.8) for the same groups, respectively. X-ray diffraction revealed that leucite was the main crystalline phase for Empress 1 groups, and lithium disilicate for Empress 2 groups. No further peaks were observed in the X-ray diffraction patterns of either material after repressing. Dispersed leucite crystals and cracks within the leucite crystals and glass matrix were features observed in Empress 1 for pressed and repressed samples. Similar microstructure features--dense lithium disilicate crystals within a glass matrix--were observed in Empress 2 pressed and repressed materials. However, the repressed material showed larger lithium disilicate crystals than the singly pressed material.
Conclusions:
Second pressing had no significant effect on the biaxial flexural strength of Empress 1 or Empress 2; however, higher strength variations among the repressed samples of the materials may indicate less reliability of these materials after second pressing.
Related Concept Videos
Stress-Strain Diagram - Brittle Materials
Behavior of Concrete Under Compressive Load
As the concrete specimen fractures under...
Fiber Reinforced Concrete
Plastic Behavior
Relation between Poisson's ratio, Modulus of Elasticity and Modulus of Rigidity
Strength of Cement
For compressive strength tests, ASTM C 109-05 standards prescribe a cement-sand mix ratio of 1:2.75 and a water/cement ratio of 0.485 for making 2-inch cubes. These cubes are mixed, cast, and cured in saturated lime water at 23°C until testing. Flexural strength testing, outlined in ASTM C...

