Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Cervical collars: a clinical and biomechanical study].

W Bruns1, G Von Salis-Soglio, W Plitz

  • 1Orthopädische Klinik und Poliklinik am Universitätsklinikum Leipzig AöR.

Zeitschrift Fur Orthopadie Und Ihre Grenzgebiete
|September 4, 2004
PubMed
Summary

Cervical collars show varying stiffness, but this does not significantly impact movement limitation in healthy individuals. Softer collars offer better subjective comfort without compromising necessary support for cervical spine issues.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Not Available].

Operative Orthopadie und Traumatologie·2016
Same author

[Pain assessment in routine care : A prospective observational study in an orthopedic unit].

Schmerz (Berlin, Germany)·2016
Same author

Development of a new suturing technique for tendon graft preparation: an animal cadaver study.

Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)·2015
Same author

Dynamic in vitro analysis of tractile forces of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) transplant using patellar and semitendinosus muscle tendon: a cadaver study.

Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery·2014
Same author

[Damage to implants due to high-frequency electrocautery : analysis of four fractured hip endoprostheses shafts].

Der Orthopade·2014
Same author

[The impact of capsular repair on the dislocation rate after primary total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective analysis of 1972 cases].

Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und Unfallchirurgie·2014

Area of Science:

  • Biomechanics
  • Orthopedics
  • Spinal Medicine

Background:

  • Cervical collars are widely used for non-operative and postoperative cervical spine management.
  • Existing collars vary significantly in design, stability, comfort, and cost.
  • Limited scientific literature exists on optimal cervical collar selection and performance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To biomechanically and clinically investigate the performance of 10 different cervical collars.
  • To assess the relationship between cervical collar stiffness and movement limitation.
  • To evaluate subjective patient comfort with varying collar designs.

Main Methods:

  • Biomechanical testing of 10 cervical collars from 4 manufacturers under defined loads.
  • Clinical evaluation of movement limitation in 30 healthy subjects (aged 20-60) wearing the collars.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Subjective assessment of comfort and acceptance.

    • Main Results:

    • Biomechanical tests revealed significant differences in stiffness across collars, particularly during axial load, sideward, and backward bending.
    • Clinical studies showed minimal differences in movement limitation among the tested collars.
    • Softer cervical collars were generally preferred in subjective comfort assessments.

    Conclusions:

    • A minimum level of stiffness, present in all tested collars, is sufficient for achieving desired movement limitation.
    • Increased collar stiffness beyond this minimum does not enhance movement restriction.
    • Higher stiffness in cervical collars primarily reduces patient comfort without additional functional benefit.