Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Minimally invasive radical prostatectomy.

Mitchell R Humphreys1, Matthew T Gettman, George K Chow

  • 1Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minn 55905, USA.

Mayo Clinic Proceedings
|September 11, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Salvage lymph node dissection in oligo-recurrent prostate cancer patients: Mapping patterns of recurrence and factors associated with disease progression.

Urologic oncology·2026
Same author

Whose Hands on the Robot? Rethinking Roles in Nerve Sheath Tumor Surgery.

World neurosurgery·2026
Same author

The Impact of Open Surgical Team Consistency on Oncologic and Functional Outcomes Following Radical Prostatectomy.

Mayo Clinic proceedings·2025
Same author

Descriptive report of complex cystic renal mass fluid cytology: a cross-sectional analysis.

Translational andrology and urology·2025
Same author

Enhancing Accuracy of Operative Reports with Automated Artificial Intelligence Analysis of Surgical Video.

Journal of the American College of Surgeons·2025
Same author

Methylated DNA Markers in Voided Urine for the Identification of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.

Life (Basel, Switzerland)·2024

Minimally invasive surgery for prostate cancer, including laparoscopic and robot-assisted approaches, offers comparable oncologic and functional outcomes to open surgery. Continued evaluation is crucial for establishing new standards of care.

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Surgical Oncology
  • Minimally Invasive Surgery

Background:

  • Advanced laparoscopic and robot-assisted technologies have introduced novel surgical options for organ-confined prostate cancer.
  • Assessment of these minimally invasive techniques is vital to ensure they match or exceed outcomes from open radical prostatectomy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and evaluate current published data on minimally invasive approaches for prostate cancer treatment.
  • To enhance awareness regarding the viability and comparative outcomes of these techniques.

Main Methods:

  • Critical review of larger patient series undergoing laparoscopic (transperitoneal and extraperitoneal) and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomies.
  • Comparison of minimally invasive techniques with published data on open radical prostatectomy.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Evaluation of techniques based on prostate-specific antigen progression-free survival, surgical margin status, blood loss, transfusion rates, pain, hospitalization, catheterization duration, potency, continence, and complications.
  • Inclusion of relative cost data for each surgical method.

Conclusions:

  • Minimally invasive approaches demonstrate comparable oncologic and functional outcomes to open radical prostatectomy.
  • The availability of multiple surgical options challenges surgeons to develop a new standard of care, optimizing patient morbidity and outcomes.