Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 22, 2026

Custom-made Microdialysis Probe Design
Published on: July 21, 2015
Direct dialysis quantification: investigation of the impact of dialysate preservation techniques on solute assays
Nigel S Kanagasundaram1, Amy Posch, A Brett Larive
1Section of Dialysis and Extracorporeal Therapy, Department of Hypertension/Nephrology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA. suren.kanagasundaram@nuth.nhs.uk
Aims:
Urease-producing microorganisms may lower urea nitrogen (UN) during dialysate-side dosing. We investigated the impact of 3 proven preservatives (acetic acid, ceftazidime, thimerosal) on UN concentration, and the concentrations of creatinine (CR) and beta2-microglobulin (beta2M).
Methods:
The UN, CR and beta2M concentrations were assayed in 3 separate aliquots from 20 spent dialysate samples (ceftazidime, 125 mg/l, or 1% thimerosal, 1 ml/l, vs. control). The beta2M concentration was assayed in 10 further spent dialysate collections (concentrated glacial acetic acid, 5 ml/l, vs. control). Solute concentrations were compared with the concordance correlation coefficient (rc).
Results:
Ceftazidime and thimerosal had little effect on the concentrations of UN and CR (rc >0.97). For the beta2M concentration, agreement remained good (rc >0.96) for ceftazidime and thimerosal (although the former tended to lower concentrations) but acetic acid was less optimal (rc = 0.893).
Conclusions:
Ceftazidime and thimerosal may be used as dialysate preservatives without affecting the UN or CR concentrations. Thimerosal is to be preferred when studying beta2M. Acetic acid produces unacceptable inaccuracy when measuring beta2M.
Related Concept Videos
Dialysis
Peritoneal Dialysis I: Introduction and Procedure
Peritoneal Dialysis II: Peritoneal Dialysis Systems and Complications
EDTA: Indirect and Alkalimetric Titration
Acute Kidney Injury V: Interprofessional Care
