Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Problems and solutions with integrating terminologies into evolving knowledge bases.

Kurt L Rickard1, José L V Mejino, Richard F Martin

  • 1Structural Informatics Group, Department of Biological Structure, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics
|September 14, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Spatial Distribution of Cortical Output Zones Affecting Combinations of Forelimb Muscles in the Monkey.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Evaluating the granularity balance of hierarchical relationships within large biomedical terminologies towards quality improvement.

Journal of biomedical informatics·2017
Same author

From SNOMED CT to Uberon: Transferability of evaluation methodology between similarly structured ontologies.

Artificial intelligence in medicine·2017
Same author

Development of a Novel Markov Chain Model for the Prediction of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Dissemination.

AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium·2017
Same author

Multi-species Ontologies of the Craniofacial Musculoskeletal System.

CEUR workshop proceedings·2017
Same author

From frames to OWL2: Converting the Foundational Model of Anatomy.

Artificial intelligence in medicine·2016

We integrated two anatomical terminologies with the Foundational Model of Anatomy ontology. This process yielded solutions for merging legacy data with structured biological ontologies.

Area of Science:

  • Anatomy
  • Bioinformatics
  • Ontology Engineering

Background:

  • Established anatomical terminologies often lack standardization.
  • Integrating legacy data with modern ontologies presents significant challenges.
  • The Foundational Model of Anatomy (FMA) provides a structured ontology for biological structures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe the process and challenges of merging two anatomical terminologies with the Foundational Model of Anatomy.
  • To present solutions for integrating legacy terminologies into a disciplined ontology.
  • To demonstrate the generalizability of these solutions for domain-specific data integration.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of two established anatomical terminologies.
  • Development of mapping strategies between legacy terms and the Foundational Model of Anatomy.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Iterative refinement of the ontology based on integration challenges.

    • Main Results:

    • Successfully merged two distinct anatomical terminologies into the Foundational Model of Anatomy.
    • Identified and documented common problems encountered during terminology integration.
    • Developed and validated practical solutions for resolving terminological discrepancies and semantic ambiguities.

    Conclusions:

    • The integration of legacy terminologies with ontologies like the FMA is feasible.
    • The identified problems and solutions are applicable to broader data integration tasks in biology.
    • This work facilitates a more unified and standardized representation of anatomical knowledge.