Search research articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Internationalizing professional codes in engineering.

Charles E Harris¹

¹Philosophy Department, Texas A & M University, College Station, Texas 77843-4237, USA. e-harris@philosophy.tamu.edu

Science and Engineering Ethics

|September 15, 2004

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Sacral Stress Fractures: They See You, But Are You Seeing Them?

Current sports medicine reports·2016

Same author

Classification and moral evaluation of uncertainties in engineering modeling.

Science and engineering ethics·2010

Same author

The good engineer: giving virtue its due in engineering ethics.

Science and engineering ethics·2008

Same author

Aborting abnormal fetuses: the parental perspective.

Journal of applied philosophy·1991

Same journal

Not Another Grocery List: Proposals for an Effective AI Ethics Implementation.

Science and engineering ethics·2026

Same journal

From Biopiracy to Sustainable Knowledge Governance: Epistemic Justice and the Reconstruction of Resource Sovereignty in the Global South.

Science and engineering ethics·2026

Same journal

Deliberative Lab Communication and the Practice of Ethical Science.

Science and engineering ethics·2026

Same journal

Graduate Students Find Content of Responsible Conduct of Research Coursework Useful.

Science and engineering ethics·2026

Same journal

Discursive Ethics as a Normative Foundation for Integrating Ethics into AI Clinical Decision Support Systems.

Science and engineering ethics·2026

Same journal

Tragedies of Technology: An Exploration of Such Narratives.

Science and engineering ethics·2026

See all related articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Professional engineering societies like ASME International face challenges applying ethical codes globally. This study identifies culture-transcending guidelines and methods for effective international engineering ethics application.

Area of Science:

Engineering Ethics
International Professional Standards

Background:

Professional engineering societies in the US, including ASME International, acknowledge the need for global ethical code applicability.
Existing ethical codes present significant application challenges in international contexts, particularly outside the United States.

Purpose of the Study:

To address the complexities of applying engineering ethical codes in a globalized professional environment.
To identify universally applicable guidelines and practical methods for international engineering ethics.

Main Methods:

Examination of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) International's ethical code.
Identification and justification of Culture Transcending Guidelines.
Development of methods for applying codes to specific international situations.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

Nine Culture Transcending Guidelines were identified and justified.
Three methods for applying ethical codes were developed: specification, balancing, and creative middle way.
The study highlights the need for adaptable frameworks to navigate diverse societal norms.

Conclusions:

Effective international application of engineering ethics requires both universal guidelines and context-specific methods.
Adapting ethical codes to different cultural and societal contexts is crucial for global engineering practice.
The proposed guidelines and methods offer a framework for addressing ethical dilemmas faced by engineers worldwide.