Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Informed consent in Texas: theory and practice.

Mark J Cherry1, H Tristram Engelhardt

  • 1Department of Philosophy, Saint Edward's University, 3001 S. Congress Ave., Box 844, Austin, TX 78704, USA. markc@admin.stedwards.edu

The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy
|September 17, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same authorSame journal

Neurobiological Determinism versus Human Freedom: Competing Explanatory Models and the Hope for Moral Enhancement.

The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2026
Same author

Editors' Statement on the Responsible Use of Generative AI Technologies in Scholarly Journal Publishing.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2023
Same author

Correction: Editors' statement on the responsible use of generative AI technologies in scholarly journal publishing.

Medicine, health care, and philosophy·2023
Same author

Editors' statement on the responsible use of generative AI technologies in scholarly journal publishing.

Medicine, health care, and philosophy·2023
Same author

Editors' Statement on the Responsible Use of Generative AI Technologies in Scholarly Journal Publishing.

AJOB neuroscience·2023
Same author

Editors' Statement on the Responsible Use of Generative AI Technologies in Scholarly Journal Publishing.

Ethics & human research·2023

In Texas, informed consent law acknowledges individual autonomy while also recognizing family members' decision-making authority for incapacitated patients. This dual approach balances personal rights with familial responsibilities in healthcare.

Area of Science:

  • Bioethics
  • Legal Studies
  • Medical Law

Background:

  • Informed consent is a cornerstone of patient autonomy in medical decision-making.
  • Texas law traditionally emphasizes individual authority over personal healthcare choices.

Observation:

  • The study examines the practical application of informed consent in Texas, particularly concerning out-of-hospital do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders.
  • Texas legislation provides a default mechanism for medical decision-making when patients lack capacity and a proxy.

Findings:

  • Despite affirming individual autonomy, Texas law creates a "defeasible presumption" favoring "qualified relatives" as surrogate decision-makers for incapacitated patients.
  • This legal framework allows families to make choices for terminally ill members who have lost decisional capacity.
Keywords:
Legal ApproachProfessional Patient Relationship

Related Experiment Videos

Implications:

  • Texas law reflects a complex, multi-tiered public morality that respects both individual self-determination and the role of families in healthcare.
  • This model offers insights into balancing patient autonomy with familial involvement in end-of-life care decisions.