Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 22, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
Published on: March 1, 2022
Inconsistency of maximum parsimony revisited
1Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th Street, New York, NY 10024, USA. schulmei@amnh.org
Abstract:
Felsenstein (1978, Syst. Zool. 27:401-410) showed that the method of maximum parsimony can be inconsistent, i.e., lead to an incorrect result with an infinite amount of data. The situation in which this inconsistency occurs is often called the "Felsenstein zone," the phenomenon also known as "long-branch attraction." Felsenstein derived a sufficient inconsistency condition from a model for four taxa with only two different parameters for the probability of change on the five branches connecting the four taxa. In the present paper, his approach is used to derive the inconsistency condition of maximum parsimony from the most general model for four taxa, i.e., with five different parameters for the probabilities of change on the five branches and, for the first time, for characters with k states (k = 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, ...) This is used to determine the factors that can cause the inconsistency of maximum parsimony. It is shown that the probability of change on all five branches and the number of character states play a role in causing inconsistency.
Related Concept Videos
Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect
Multi-species Conserved Sequences
Although the genome of each species varies greatly from each other, a few sequences are highly conserved. Such conserved DNA...
Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests
Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...
Phylogenetic Trees
Phylogenetic Trees

