Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

What methods do stakeholders prefer for feeding back performance data: a qualitative study in palliative care.

Marjolein Gysels1, Rhidian Hughes, Fiona Aspinal

  • 1Department of Palliative Care and Policy, King's College, London, UK. marjolein.gysels@kcl.ac.uk

International Journal for Quality in Health Care : Journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care
|September 18, 2004
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Professional Perspectives on Supporting People With Dementia Who Live Alone and Have No Informal Support: A Qualitative Study.

Dementia (London, England)·2026
Same author

'Maze' not pathway: focus group exploration of patients' and public experiences of the UK NHS elective total joint arthroplasty pathway.

BMJ open·2023
Same author

Implementation of the national Getting it Right First Time orthopaedic programme in England: a qualitative case study analysis.

BMJ open·2023
Same author

The Impact of Digital Health Interventions for the Management of Type 2 Diabetes on Health and Social Care Utilisation and Costs: A Systematic Review.

PharmacoEconomics - open·2022
Same author

Mixed methods evaluation of the Getting it Right First Time programme in elective orthopaedic surgery in England: an analysis from the National Joint Registry and Hospital Episode Statistics.

BMJ open·2022
Same author

A Protocol for a Mixed-Methods Process Evaluation of a Local Population Health Management System to Reduce Inequities in COVID-19 Vaccination Uptake.

International journal of environmental research and public health·2022

Stakeholders prefer qualitative feedback over visual data like league tables or box plots for healthcare decision-making. Effective performance data presentation should be constructive and adaptable to real-world health service contexts.

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Healthcare Management
  • Palliative Care

Background:

  • Effective performance data presentation is crucial for informed decision-making in healthcare.
  • Current feedback methods may not adequately support the complex needs of service commissioners and providers.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate stakeholder opinions on presenting performance data.
  • To develop effective feedback mechanisms for better data utilization in healthcare decision-making.

Main Methods:

  • Qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews with 36 healthcare stakeholders.
  • Presentation of league tables and box plots as illustrative feedback formats.
  • Exploration of feedback effectiveness, characteristics, and improvement ideas.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Box plots were favored over league tables, but both were seen as insufficient without additional context.
  • Qualitative information was preferred over pictorial representations.
  • Feedback must be constructive, adaptable, and include contextual details for effective decision-making.

Conclusions:

  • Qualitative research is vital for understanding end-of-life care quality.
  • The patient's subjective experience and lay perspective are essential components of quality assessment.
  • Feedback mechanisms should incorporate qualitative insights and patient perspectives.