Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 11, 2026

A Human-machine-interface Integrating Low-cost Sensors with a Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation System for Post-stroke Balance Rehabilitation
Published on: April 12, 2016
Dynamical stability in the acquisition and performance of rhythmic ball manipulation: theoretical insights with a
Dagmar Sternad1, Tjeerd M H Dijkstra
1Department of Kinesiology, 266 Rec Hall, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16803, USA. dxs48@psu.edu
Abstract:
Three experiments illustrate how a task-based approach and dynamical modeling of a perceptual-motor task can provide a useful framework for understanding functional and dysfunctional behavior. In the chosen task, subjects held a racket and bounced a ball rhythmically in the air with invariant ball amplitude. As such, the task could be cast into a mechanical model that encompassed the movements of the actor (racket) and the manipulandum (ball). In this form, the movement task is a dynamical system that displays dynamical stability, i.e., performance where perturbations die out by themselves. The hypothesis is that skilled actors seek to perform with this "passive" stability as it alleviates the control demands because perturbations do not require explicit corrections. In the experimental data, this strategy could be characterized by a single parameter, the acceleration of the racket at impact, which provided quantitative predictions. Experiment 1 established that subjects with normal sensorimotor functions indeed performed with racket acceleration values that were predicted to provide passive stability. Experiment 2 showed that subjects improved their skill over a course of 40 practice trials, as evidenced in decreased variability and accompanied by a change in racket acceleration toward values that provided optimal stability. In experiment 3, perturbations were applied and the subjects' adaptability was tested. When perturbations were large enough, subjects altered their racket timing to resume contact that provided stability. The results are discussed with their relevance to clinical contexts: How can such a task-based approach provide insights into the control of functional and dysfunctional movements? Can such behavioral results serve as a diagnostic tool? How can this approach to sensorimotor behavior stimulate physicians and therapists to progress therapeutic measures?

