Importance of complex additional stenosis after primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction in medium-term prognosis
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 22, 2026

Coronary Progenitor Cells and Soluble Biomarkers in Cardiovascular Prognosis after Coronary Angioplasty
Published on: January 28, 2020
Ana Teresa Timóteo1, António Fiarresga, Joana Feliciano
1Serviço de Cardiologia, Hospital de Santa Marta, Lisboa, Portugal. ana_timoteo@yahoo.com
Insights
Complex additional stenosis after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is linked to a worse 1-year prognosis. Early intervention may be crucial for plaque stabilization in these high-risk patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
Background:
- Controversy exists regarding optimal revascularization strategies for acute myocardial infarction (AMI).
- Complex additional coronary artery stenosis can negatively impact patient prognosis following primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the medium-term (1-year) prognosis in patients with ST-segment elevation AMI who underwent primary PCI.
- To assess the impact of complex additional coronary artery stenosis on patient outcomes after primary PCI.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 138 patients undergoing primary PCI for ST-elevation AMI.
- Patients were categorized into two groups: those with and without complex additional stenosis.
- One-year follow-up assessed combined endpoints of death, reinfarction, and myocardial revascularization.
Main Results:
- Angiographic success rate was 96.4%.
- The group with complex additional stenosis experienced a higher rate of death/reinfarction/revascularization (32% vs. 13%, p=0.014).
- Independent predictors of a worse 1-year outcome included Killip class ≥2 and the presence of complex additional stenosis.
Conclusions:
- Complex additional stenosis following primary PCI is associated with a poorer 1-year prognosis.
- Early interventions may be necessary to stabilize plaque, especially within the first 30 days post-AMI.
Background:
There is some controversy about the ideal type of revascularization in the context of primary angioplasty (percutaneous coronary intervention--PCI) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The presence of additional stenosis, especially if complex, can have an impact on prognosis.
Objectives:
To evaluate medium-term (1-year) prognosis according to the presence of complex additional stenosis after primary PCI.
Population And Methods:
A retrospective study of 138 consecutive patients admitted to our unit for ST-segment elevation AMI who underwent primary PCI. Patients were followed up for 1 year and divided in 2 groups: without complex additional stenosis (n = 69, 61 +/- 14 years, 62% males) and with complex additional stenosis (n = 69, 65 +/- 13 years, 73% males, p = NS). We evaluated demographic characteristics, risk factors for coronary artery disease, previous cardiac history and signs of heart failure on admission. Angiographic characteristics, medication and PCI outcome were also evaluated. The impact of these variables on the combined end-point of death, reinfarction, and myocardial revascularization at 1 year was assessed.
Results:
The angiographic success rate was 96.4%. Twenty-four percent of patients were aged 75 years or over and 4.3% of the total population were in Killip class IV on admission. Anterior AMI was slightly more common in the non-complex additional stenosis group (60% vs. 44%, p = 0.06), and inferior AMI in the complex additional stenosis group (26% vs. 42%, p = 0.07). One-vessel disease was more prevalent in the group without complex additional stenosis, as expected (86% vs. 11%, p < 0.001) and stent implantation was also more frequent in this group (96% vs. 86%, p = 0.08). There were no differences in other variables. Death/reinfarction/revascularization was more frequent in the group with complex additional stenosis (13% vs. 32%, p = 0.014). Sixty-seven per cent of the events occurred in the first 30 days of follow-up. At 1 year, univariate predictors of outcome were Killip class > or = 2, TIMI flow < 3 in the infarct-related vessel after PCI, non-use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists, beta-blockers or statins, multivessel disease, and the presence of complex additional stenosis (log rank, p = 0.003). Using multivariate regression analysis, the independent predictors of outcome at 1 year were Killip class > or = 2 (OR 0.28; 95% CI 0.08-0.93, p = 0.037) and the presence of complex additional stenosis (OR 0.32; 95% CI 0.12-0.84, p = 0.020).
Conclusions:
The presence of complex additional stenosis after primary PCI had a worse prognosis at 1 year, suggesting the need for further interventions to stabilize the plaque, particularly in the first 30 days after AMI.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations
Angina IV: Management
Angina II: Classification