Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Is the S-opponent chromatic sub-system sluggish?

H E Smithson1, J D Mollon

  • 1Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, 11-43 Bath Street, EC1V 9EL, UK. hes1003@cam.ac.uk

Vision Research
|September 24, 2004
PubMed
Summary

The study found that the S-opponent pathway is not as slow as previously thought. Reaction time measurements show minimal latency differences between S-opponent and L/M-opponent visual pathways.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Legacy of Perley G. Nutting Jr.: The Past and the Present of Chromatic Discrimination.

Annual review of vision science·2026
Same author

Assessment of the Penn anomaloscope.

Biomedical optics express·2025
Same author

Effect of stimulus size on chromatic discrimination.

Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision·2025
Same author

A possible mechanism of neural read-out from a molecular engram.

Neurobiology of learning and memory·2023
Same author

Bongard and Smirnov on the tetrachromacy of extra-foveal vision.

Vision research·2021
Same author

Discrimination of hue angle and discrimination of colorimetric purity assessed with a common metric.

Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision·2020

Area of Science:

  • Visual neuroscience
  • Human psychophysics
  • Color vision

Background:

  • The S-opponent pathway is widely believed to be slower than the L/M-opponent pathway.
  • Previous research suggests S-opponent signals in Macaque V1 are available 96-135 ms post-stimulus, while L/M-opponent signals appear at 68-95 ms.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To psychophysically investigate the latency difference between S-opponent and L/M-opponent visual pathways.
  • To determine if the claimed significant latency difference between these pathways is observable in human perception.

Main Methods:

  • Measurement of reaction times to chromatic increments (S/(L+M) and L/(L+M)).
  • Empirical determination of the equiluminant plane and tritan line.
  • Use of spatio-temporal luminance noise to mask luminance cues.
  • Adaptive staircase method for 'go, no-go' task to estimate thresholds and reaction times.

Main Results:

  • When stimuli are brief, confined to chromatic channels, and presented at equivalent threshold levels, the latency difference is significantly reduced.
  • Visually triggered reaction times indicate a maximum latency difference of 20-30 ms between the L/M-opponent and S-opponent sub-systems.

Conclusions:

  • The perceived latency difference between S-opponent and L/M-opponent pathways is much smaller than previously reported.
  • These findings challenge the notion of a sluggish S-opponent pathway in human color vision.

Related Experiment Videos