Quantifying losses to the donated blood supply due to donor deferral and miscollection

Brian Custer1, Eric S Johnson, Sean D Sullivan

  • 1Pharmaceutical Outcomes Research and Policy Program, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA. bcuster@bloodsystems.org

Transfusion
|September 24, 2004
PubMed

Insights

Blood donation deferrals and miscollections are significant, often exceeding losses from disease markers. Many deferrals, particularly temporary ones, could be avoided to boost blood supply without new donor recruitment.

Area of Science:

  • Blood Transfusion Medicine
  • Public Health
  • Donor Management

Background:

  • Donor deferral is a critical factor impacting blood supply.
  • While disease marker deferrals are known, other deferral reasons are less quantified.
  • Understanding all deferral causes is vital for optimizing blood collection.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantify donor and donation losses beyond disease marker screening.
  • To analyze deferral and miscollection rates in allogeneic whole-blood donations.
  • To identify key reasons for donor deferral and donation unit loss.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of three datasets from Blood Centers of the Pacific for year 2000 donations.
  • Detailed examination of donor deferral reasons and miscollection events.
  • Stratification of losses by donor demographics and donation history.

Main Results:

  • 13.6% of presenting donors were deferred; 68.5% of deferrals were short-term (e.g., hematocrit).
  • Long-term deferrals (e.g., travel, tattoos) and permanent deferrals (e.g., vCJD risk) also contributed significantly.
  • Miscollection (under/overweight units) resulted in 3.8% loss of collected units, varying by donor type and age.

Conclusions:

  • Temporary deferrals and miscollections are more frequent than disease marker losses.
  • Avoidable deferrals present an opportunity to increase blood supply.
  • Strategies to reduce deferrals could enhance blood availability without new donor recruitment.
Abstract