Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 10, 2026

Clinical Application of Phase Angle and BIVA Z-Score Analyses in Patients Admitted to an Emergency Department with Acute Heart Failure
Published on: June 30, 2023
Survival associated with two sets of diagnostic criteria for congestive heart failure
Gina D Schellenbaum1, Thomas D Rea, Susan R Heckbert
1Department of Epidemiology, Cardiovascular Health Research Unit, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. ginas@u.washington.edu
Insights
Congestive heart failure (CHF) definitions vary. This study found similar survival rates for CHF patients identified by Framingham criteria alone, Cardiovascular Health Study criteria alone, or both, indicating comparable mortality across diagnostic groups.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Epidemiology
- Gerontology
Background:
- Congestive heart failure (CHF) definitions differ across epidemiologic studies.
- The Framingham Heart Study (FHS) and Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS) use distinct criteria for CHF diagnosis.
- Varied definitions can impact the understanding of CHF incidence and survival.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare CHF incidence and survival patterns using FHS and CHS diagnostic criteria.
- To analyze survival differences between patients meeting both criteria, only FHS criteria, or only CHS criteria.
Main Methods:
- Utilized data from the Cardiovascular Health Study, a cohort of 5,888 elderly US adults.
- Constructed an inception cohort of 875 hospitalized CHF patients between 1989 and 2000.
- Compared diagnostic classifications: concordant (both criteria), FHS-only, and CHS-only.
Main Results:
- 54% of CHF events met both FHS and CHS criteria (concordant).
- 31% met only FHS criteria, and 15% met only CHS criteria.
- No significant survival differences were observed between FHS-only, CHS-only, and concordant groups.
Conclusions:
- Framingham criteria identify more incident CHF cases than CHS criteria alone.
- All-cause mortality rates were similar across different CHF diagnostic classifications.
- CHF diagnostic criteria variations do not appear to significantly impact survival outcomes in this elderly cohort.
Abstract:
Congestive heart failure (CHF) definitions vary across epidemiologic studies. The Framingham Heart Study criteria include CHF signs and symptoms assessed by a physician panel. In the Cardiovascular Health Study, a committee of physicians adjudicated CHF diagnoses, confirmed by signs, symptoms, clinical tests, and/or medical therapy. The authors used data from the Cardiovascular Health Study, a population-based cohort study of 5,888 elderly US adults, to compare CHF incidence and survival patterns following onset of CHF as defined by Framingham and/or Cardiovascular Health Study criteria. They constructed an inception cohort of nonfatal, hospitalized CHF patients. Of 875 participants who had qualifying CHF hospitalizations between 1989 and 2000, 54% experienced a first CHF event that fulfilled both sets of diagnostic criteria (concordant), 31% fulfilled only the Framingham criteria (Framingham only), and 15% fulfilled only the Cardiovascular Health Study criteria (Cardiovascular Health Study only). No significant survival difference was found between the Framingham-only group (hazard ratio = 0.87, 95% confidence interval: 0.71, 1.07) or the Cardiovascular Health Study-only group (hazard ratio = 0.89, 95% confidence interval: 0.68, 1.15) and the concordant group (referent). Compared with Cardiovascular Health Study central adjudication, Framingham criteria for CHF identified a larger group of participants with incident CHF, but all-cause mortality rates were similar across these diagnostic classifications.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Heart Failure III: Clinical Manifestations
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy

