Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 22, 2026

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
Published on: February 16, 2011
Research: a vital component of optimal patient care in the United States
1Division of Research and Optimal Patient Care, American College of Surgeons, Chicago, IL, USA. rsj@virginia.edu
Abstract:
In 1975, a trend began in which applications of MDs to the National Institutes of Health for research funding became less successful than applications from PhDs or MD/PhDs. MD/PhDs were the most successful applicants. Concomitantly, proposals for clinical research were less successful than nonclinical proposals. Since 1975, surgeons have fared disproportionately worse than researchers in other clinical disciplines in obtaining funding from the National Institutes of Health. Despite the efforts of surgical organizations, surgeons continue to fall farther behind in getting National Institutes of Health support for research. The most likely cause of this problem is that the surgical profession has failed to develop and sustain an adequate research workforce.
Insights
Since 1975, medical doctors (MDs) applying for National Institutes of Health research funding have become less successful than PhDs or MD/PhDs. Surgeons specifically face significant funding challenges, likely due to an inadequate research workforce.
Area of Science:
- Medical research funding trends
- Surgical research workforce development
Background:
- Since 1975, a decline in National Institutes of Health (NIH) research funding success rates for medical doctors (MDs) has been observed.
- Applications from PhDs and MD/PhDs have historically shown greater success than those from MDs alone.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the trends in NIH research funding success rates for different academic degrees (MD, PhD, MD/PhD).
- To investigate the disparity in NIH funding success between surgeons and other clinical researchers.
- To identify potential reasons for the declining success of surgeons in obtaining research grants.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of NIH application success rates from 1975 onwards.
- Comparison of funding success across different academic degrees (MD, PhD, MD/PhD).
- Comparative analysis of funding success between surgical and non-surgical clinical disciplines.
Main Results:
- MD/PhDs consistently demonstrated the highest success rates in NIH funding applications.
- Clinical research proposals have been less successful than nonclinical proposals since 1975.
- Surgeons have experienced a disproportionately greater decline in NIH funding success compared to other clinical researchers.
Conclusions:
- The surgical profession's struggle to secure NIH funding is likely linked to a failure in developing and maintaining a robust research workforce.
- Addressing the deficit in surgical research training and support is crucial for improving grant success rates.
- Interventions aimed at strengthening the surgical research pipeline are necessary to reverse the negative funding trends.
Related Concept Videos
Introduction To Health Care Delivery System
The Institute of Medicine (IOM) advocates for a patient-centered, effective, safe, timely, equitable, and effective healthcare system. The National Priorities...
Patient-centered Care
Purpose of Health Records I
Here's a breakdown of how health records serve these purposes:
Standards of Care I
Standards of Care II
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare: